Category Archives: U.S.A.

24-minute game-changing video: Electronic ‘voting’ machines without physical evidence = OBVIOUS ongoing election fraud; central method to pick a 51% to 49% ‘winner’ with fractionalized ‘counting’ documented

Black Box Voting’s Bev Harris explains the following 24 minute video:

A real-time demo of the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found, with context and explanation. Demonstration uses a real voting system and real vote databases and takes place in seconds across multiple jurisdictions.

Over 5000 subcontractors and middlemen have the access to perform this for any or all clients. It can give contract signing authority to whoever the user chooses. All political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors.

“It’s a product. It’s scaleable. It learns its environment and can adjust to any political environment, any demographic. It runs silently, invisibly, and can produce plausible results that really pass for the real thing.”

Provides solutions and actions for immediate deterrence.


The Onion’s 2-minute satire of this ongoing condition:

My best frame of this obvious condition:

When Americans are told an election is defined by touching a computer screen without a countable receipt that can be verified, they are being told a criminal lie to allow election fraud. This is self-evident, but PrincetonStanford, and the President of the American Statistical Association are among the leaders pointing to the obvious (and hereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehere). Again, no professional would/can argue an election is legitimate when there is nothing for anyone to count.

Election fraud is one of ~100 Emperor’s New Clothes game-changing and professionally documented facts that reveal ongoing .01% empire with associated crimes.

The Crimes

  • The US is a literal rogue state empire led by neocolonial looting liars. The history is uncontested and taught to anyone taking comprehensive courses. If anyone has any refutations of this professional academic factual claim for any of this easy-to-read and documented content, please provide it.
  • US ongoing lie-started and Orwellian-illegal Wars of Aggression require all US military and government to refuse all war orders because there are no lawful orders for obviously unlawful wars. Officers are required to arrest those who issue obviously unlawful orders. And again, those of us working for this area of justice are aware of zero attempts to refute this with, “War law states (a, b, c), so the wars are legal because (d, e, f).” All we receive is easy-to-reveal bullshit.
  • And, obviously, corporate media are criminally complicit through constant lies of omission and commission to “cover” all these crimes. Historic tragic-comic empire is only possible through such straight-face lying, making our Emperor’s New Clothes analogy perfectly chosen.
  • The top three benefits each of monetary reform and public banking total ~$1,000,000 for the average American household, and would be received nearly instantly. Please read that twice. Now look to verify for yourself.

Demanding arrests as the required and obvious public response rather than ‘voting’ for more disaster:

The categories of crime include:

  1. Wars of Aggression (the worst crime a nation can commit).
  2. Likely treason for lying to US military, ordering unlawful attack and invasions of foreign lands, and causing thousands of US military deaths.
  3. Crimes Against Humanity for ongoing intentional policy of poverty that’s killed over 400 million human beings just since 1995 (~75% children; more deaths than from all wars in Earth’s recorded history).
  4. Tens of trillions in looting, including $6.5 trillion just reported by the US Department of “Defense” as “lost.”

US military, law enforcement, and all with Oaths to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, face an endgame choice:

In just 90 seconds, former US Marine Ken O’Keefe powerfully states how you may choose to voice “very obvious solutions”: arrest the criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):

Solutions worth literal tens of trillions to ‘We the People’:

Again:

  • The top three benefits each of monetary reform and public banking total ~$1,000,000 for the average American household, and would be received nearly instantly. Please read that twice. Now look to verify for yourself.
  • We can quantify the end of the lie-started and illegal Wars of Aggression quickly into the trillions, and that said, it’s worth a lot more than what we quantify.
  • Truth: a world in which education is expressed in its full potential to only and always begin with good-faith effort for objective, comprehensive, and verifiable data.

Would an ‘interview’ with George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams help?

If so, here are two:

July 4th, 2016 interview with Washington, Jefferson, Adams: America’s REQUIREMENT from our Declaration of Independence & Constitution to arrest .01% criminal ‘Nobility class,’ or suffer as their indentured servants

‘Election’ 2016 interview with Washington, Jefferson, Adams: America’s right and necessity to arrest .01% tyrants engaged in lie-started illegal Wars of Aggression, bankster-looting, and constant lying

**

Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences (and here). I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.

**

Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: Examiner.com has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: herehere).

 

24-minute game-changing video: Electronic ‘voting’ machines without physical evidence = OBVIOUS ongoing election fraud; central method to pick a 51% to 49% ‘winner’ with fractionalized ‘counting’ documented.

The FBI Can’t Actually Investigate a Candidate Such as Hillary Clinton

 

The FBI Can’t Actually Investigate a Candidate Such as Hillary Clinton

The power above the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the US Attorney General, and, above that person, the US President.

That’s whom the FBI actually serves — not the US public.

Eric ZUESSE | 05.11.2016 | OPINION

The FBI Can’t Actually Investigate a Candidate Such as Hillary Clinton

The power above the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the US Attorney General, and, above that person, the US President.

That’s whom the FBI actually serves — not the US public.

This is the reason why the FBI is having such internal tensions and dissensions over the investigation of Hillary Clinton: Not only is she the current President’s ardently preferred and designated successor — and overwhelmingly supported also by America’s aristocracy and endorsed by the aristocracy’s press — but the top leadership of the FBI have terms-in-office that (unlike, for example, the term of the US Attorney General) do not end with the installation of the next President; and these people will therefore be serving, quite possibly, the very same person whom they are now ‘investigating’. This is the reason why James Comey, the FBI’s Director, let Clinton totally off the hook on July 5th, when he declined to present the case to a grand jury: he and the rest of the FBI’s top management violated three basic principles of trying white-collar-crime cases when a prosecutor is serious about wanting to prosecute and obtain a conviction against a person — he (and they) wanted to keep their jobs, not be fighting their boss and their likely future boss.

If America were an authentic democracy, there would be a way for the FBI to serve the public even when the US President doesn’t want it to. According to the only scientific study that has ever been done of the matter, the US federal government is a dictatorship not a democracy. This was reluctantly reported by the researchers, whose own careers are dependent upon the aristocracy which they were finding actually controls that government. They found that the US, at the federal level, is not a democracy but an «oligarchy», by which the researchers were referring to an «economic elite», America’s billionaires and centi-millionaires who control America’s international corporations and the ‘charities’ (such as think tanks) that are dependent upon them — including many that directly affect US politics, such as the think tanks or other way-stations for former US government employees to become hired by private firms.

The authors of the only empirical scientific research-study that has been done of whether the United States is a democracy, or instead a dictatorship, excluded the very term «aristocracy» (or «collective dictatorship» such as an «economic elite» is if that «elite» actually is in control of the given nation’s government) from their article. They did this so as for the meaning not to be clear to the US public. In any country in the modern world where an aristocracy exists, aristocrats nowadays try to hide their power, not (like in former eras) display their power by crowns and other public symbols of ‘the nobility’. The closest the study’s authors came to using that term, «aristocracy», was their only sentence that employed the pejorative term for an aristocracy, «oligarchy». That obscure lone sentence was: «Jeffrey Winters has posited a comparative theory of ‘Oligarchy,’ in which the wealthiest citizens — even in a ‘civil oligarchy’ like the United States — dominate policy concerning crucial issues of wealth and income protection.11″

Their 11th footnote made clear that they were referring here to the book Oligarchy, by Jeffrey A. Winters, which stated the ‘theory’ that this article had actually just confirmed in the American case. Their article mentioned the book — and the «oligarchy» — only in this one footnote, so that the authors of the article (whose own careers are dependent upon America’s ‘oligarchs’) won’t be able to be accused by oligarchs (or in any way thought by their own financial benefactors — America’s aristocrats) to have called the US an «oligarchy» (a collective dictatorship by the few super-rich and their agents). To apply either term — «aristocracy» or «oligarchy» — to one’s own country, is now viewed as negative, an insult to the country’s controlling elite. Neither scholars nor scholarly publishers wish to insult the people who ultimately are their top funders.

This article was written in the standard unnecessarily obscurantist style of social ‘scientists’ who want to be comprehensible only to their peers and not to the general public. Doing it this way is safer for them, because it makes extremely unlikely that their own benefactors would retaliate, against them or else against the institutions that hire them, by withdrawing their continued financial and promotional support (such as by no longer having them invited onto CNN as an «expert»). (This type of fear prevents theory in the social ‘sciences’ from being strictly based upon the given field’s empirical findings: it’s not authentically scientific. The physical sciences are far less corrupt, far more scientific. The biological sciences are in-between.) 

One particular reason why the authors never called the people who control the US government an «aristocracy», is that everyone knows that the Founders of the US were opposed to, and were engaged in overthrowing, the existing aristocracy, which happened to be British, and that they even banned forever in the US the use of aristocratic titles, such as «Lord» or «Sir.» Consequently, within the US, the only term that the aristocrats consider acceptable to refer to aristocrats, is «oligarchs», which always refers only to aristocrats in foreign countries, and so is considered safe by the aristocrats’ writers (including scholars and political pundits) to use.

Everyone knows: in accord with the clear intention of America’s Founders, the US should eliminate from its citizenry any aristocrat (any self-enclosed and legally immune group that holds power over the government), but Americans naturally accept the existence of «oligarchs» in other countries (and «good-riddance to them there»), typically the ones in countries US foreign policy opposes and often overthrows by means of coup or outright military invasion (any form of conquest, such as in 2003 Iraq, or 2011 Libya). It’s fine to refer to other countries’ aristocracies as ‘oligarchies’, because any such foreign aristocracy can therefore be declared to be bad and ‘deserving’ of overthrow.

Thus, any aristocracy that is opposed to America’s aristocracy (especially one that’s opposed to being controlled by the US aristocracy), and which wants to be controlling instead their own independent nation, can acceptably be overthrown by coup (such as Ukraine 2014 was) or invasion (such as Libya 2011 was). Thus, calling a foreign aristocracy an «oligarchy» is supportive of, not opposed to, the US aristocracy — and, so, «oligarchy» is the term the authors used (on that one occasion, and they never used the prohibited term «aristocracy»).

Nonetheless, despite the cultural ban on describing the US as an «aristocracy», the authors were — as obscurely as they were able — proving that the US is an aristocracy, no authentic democracy at all. Or, again, as they said it in their least-obscurantist phrasing of it: 

«Economic Elite Domination theories do rather well in our analysis, even though our findings probably understate the political influence of elites. Our measure of the preferences of wealthy or elite Americans — though useful, and the best we could generate for a large set of policy cases — is probably less consistent with the relevant preferences than are our measures of the views of ordinary citizens or the alignments of engaged interest groups. Yet we found substantial estimated effects even when using this imperfect measure. The real-world impact of elites upon public policy may be still greater».

‘Greater’ than what? They didn’t say. That’s because what they were saying (as obscurely as possible) is that it’s probably ‘greater’ than is shown in the data that was publicly available to them, and upon which data their clear finding is that the US is an aristocracy, no democracy at all. Or, as they also put it: “Economic Elite Domination theories do rather well in our analysis.» But, actually, «Economic Elite Domination theories» (virtually all of which come down to positing an aristocracy that consists of the billionaires — and centi-millionaires — and their corporations, and their think tanks, and their lobbyists, etc.) did phenomenally well, in their findings, not just ‘rather well’ — they simply can’t safely say this. Saying it is samizdat, in the US dictatorship.

They were allowed to prove it, but not to say it. So, that’s what they did. They didn’t want to «upset the applecart» from which they themselves are feeding.

The simplest (but no less accurate) way of stating their finding is: the US, at least during the period the researchers probed, which was 1981-2002, was an aristocracy, no democracy at all. The US, in other words, was (even prior to the infamous Citizens United Supreme Court decision, which is making the aristocracy even more concentrated among even fewer people) a country of men (and women — that’s to say, of individuals) not of laws; it’s a dictatorship, in short; it is not a country «of laws, not of men». America’s Founders have finally lost. The country has been taken over by an aristocracy.

And one of those «men» now, is actually Hillary Clinton, even though she is no longer officially holding governmental power. They know she soon might be. That’s why, the FBI cannot really, and seriously, investigate her.

It’s not for legal reasons at all. It’s because of whom she is. In fact, purely on the basis of US laws, she clearly ought to be in prison. Any honest lawyer, inside or outside the FBI, has long known this, because the actual case against her is ‘slam-dunk’, even though the FBI has refused to investigate it and has limited its ‘investigation’ only to peripheral ‘national security’ issues. (The #2 person at FBI, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, right below Director James Comey, specified this limitation to his ‘investigators’. They simply weren’t allowed to investigate her, except on the hardest-to-prove crimes that she probably but not definitely did also do. The slam-dunks were just off-limits to them. McCabe’s wife’s political campaign had received $675,000 from the PAC of Terry McAuliffe, a close friend of the Clintons, who chaired Hillary’s 2008 Presidential campaign. And, even on the harder-to-prove matters, which FBI Director Comey declined on July 5th to pursue, they stood a strong chance of winning, if only Comey hadn’t prevented their moving forward to try — but those issues are tangential to the basic case against her, anyway.) 

There are at least six federal criminal laws which accurately and unquestionably describe even what Ms. Clinton has now publicly admitted having done by her privatized email system, and intent isn’t even mentioned in most of them nor necessary in order for her to be convicted — the actions themselves convict her, and the only relevance that intent might have, regarding any of these laws, would be in determining how long her prison sentence would be.

I have already presented the texts of these six laws (and you can see the sentences for each one, right there), and any reader can easily recognize that each one of them describes, unambiguously without any doubt, what she now admits having done. Most of these crimes don’t require any intent in order to convict (and the ones that do require intent are only «knowingly … conceals», or else «with the intent to impair the object’s … use in an official proceeding», both of which «intents» would be easy to prove on the basis of what has already been made public — but others of these laws don’t require even that); and none of them requires any classified information to have been involved, at all. It’s just not an issue in these laws. Thus, conviction under them is far easier. If a prosecutor is really seeking to convict someone, he’ll be aiming to get indictments on the easiest-to-prove charges, first. That also presents for the prosecutor the strongest position in the event of an eventual plea-bargain. As Alan Dershowitz said, commenting on one famous prosecution: «They also wanted a slam-dunk case. They wanted the strongest possible case.» Comey simply didn’t; he wanted the hardest-to-convict case. His presentation was a brazen hoax. That’s all.

That’s the real scandal, and nobody (other than I) has been writing about it as what it is — a hoax. But what it shows is that maybe the only way that Clinton will be able to avoid going to prison is by her going to the White House. Either she gets a term in the White House, or else she gets a (much longer) term in prison — or else our government is so thoroughly corrupt that she remains free as a private citizen and still above the law, even though not serving as a federal official.

Even if she is convicted only on these six slam-dunk statutes (and on none other, including not on the ones that Comey was referring to when he said on July 5th that, «Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case»), she could be sentenced to a maximum of 73 years in prison (73 = 5 + 5 + 20 + 20 + 3 + 10 + 10). Adding on others she might also have committed (such as the ones that Comey was referring to, all of which pertain only to the handling of classified information), would mean that her term in prison might be lengthier still, but what’s important in the email case isn’t that; it’s to convict her on, essentially, theft and/or destruction of US government documents by means of transferring them into her private email and/or smashing hard drives. No one, not even a US federal official, can legally do that, and those six laws are specifically against it.

Motive is important in Ms. Clinton’s email case, because motive tells us why she was trying to hide from historians and from the public her operations as the US Secretary of State: was it because she didn’t want them to know that she was selling to the Sauds and her other friends the US State Department’s policies in return for their million-dollar-plus donations to the Clinton Foundation, and maybe even selling to them (and/or their cronies) US government contracts, or why? However, those are questions regarding other crimes that she might have been perpetrating while in public office, not the crimes of her privatized email operation itself; and those other crimes (whatever they might have been) would have been explored only after an indictment on the slam-dunks, and for further possible prosecutions, if President Obama’s people were serious about investigating her. They weren’t. Clearly, this is selective ‘justice’. That’s the type of ‘justice’ an aristocracy imposes.

Why, then, did Comey finally switch to re-open the Clinton case? It wasn’t merely the discovery of some of her previously unknown emails on the computer of Anthony Wiener, husband to Hillary’s closest aide Huma Abedin. As Politico on October 28th reported, «Another former Justice official said Comey’s letter [announcing the re-opening of Hillary’s case] could be part of an effort on his part to quiet internal FBI critics who viewed him as burying the Clinton probe for political reasons. ‘He’s come under a lot of criticism from his own people for how he’s handled this. He’s trying to gain back some of their respect,’ former Justice Department spokeswoman Emily Pierce said. ‘His ability to do what he does largely depends on the respect within his own ranks.’» 

Joachim Hagopian at Global Research headlined on October 30th, «The Real Reasons Why FBI Director James Comey Reopened the Hillary Email Investigation», and reported:

«Former federal attorney for the District of Columbia Joe diGenova spelled it all out in a WMAL radio interview last Friday just hours after the news was released that Comey had sent a letter informing Congress that the case is being reopened. DiGenova said that with an open revolt brewing inside the FBI, Comey was forced to go public on Friday with reopening the investigation. … Finally, diGenova dropped one more bombshell in Friday’s interview. An inside source has revealed to him that the laptops belonging to key Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, both wrongly granted immunity, were not destroyed after all as previously reported, but have been secretly kept intact by investigating FBI agents refusing to destroy incriminating evidence as part of the in-house whitewash».

In other words: Comey was between a rock (the resignation-letters piling up on his desk from subordinates who felt that no person should be above the law) and a hard place (his ability to stay on at the FBI and not have a scandal against himself bleed out to the public from down below). The US wasn’t yet that kind of dictatorship — one which could withstand such a public disclosure. In order for it to become one, the aristocracy’s control would have needed to be even stronger than it yet is.

Also on the 30th, Ed Klein in Britain’s Daily Mail bannered:

EXCLUSIVE: Resignation letters piling up from disaffected FBI agents, his wife urging him to admit he was wrong: Why Director Comey jumped at the chance to reopen Hillary investigation

James Comey revived the investigation of Clinton’s email server as he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents, sources say

The atmosphere at the FBI has been toxic ever since Jim [Comey] announced last July that he wouldn’t recommend an indictment against Hillary

He told his wife that he was depressed by the stack of resignation letters piling up on his desk from disaffected agents.

So, does this now mean that, finally, the FBI will bring before a grand jury the evidence that Hillary Clinton blatantly violated those six federal criminal laws against stealing and/or trying to destroy federal documents?

There has never — at least since 1981 — been so severe a test of the extent to which this nation is (as those researches found it to have unquestionably been between 1981 and 2002) an «oligarchy». However, a serious criminal prosecution of Ms. Clinton would potentially start an unwinding of this dictatorship. 

The present writer will make no prediction. However, obviously, the results of the election on November 8th will certainly have an enormous impact upon the outcome. Since I think that anyone but a complete fool can recognize this much, I’m confident enough to assert it — a conditional about the future.

 

The FBI Can’t Actually Investigate a Candidate Such as Hillary Clinton.

Hillary’s ‘Russian Hack’ Hoax: The Biggest Lie of This Election Season

 

2-clinton-podesta-email
Patrick Henningsen
21st Century Wire

The longer this soap opera drags on, it’s becoming more and more evident that the Russian government did not ‘hack’ into the DNC, and Moscow is not feeding John Podesta’s emails to Wikileaks. For those who are deeply invested in this now official conspiracy theory, this might be a hard pill to swallow. 

The White House and the Hillary Clinton campaign are now married to the idea that ‘Putin is hacking the US elections.’ In response, the President is weighing his options – tougher economic sanctions, revoking diplomatic status to Russian envoys in the US, or even deploying his newly developed ‘malicious cyber-activity’ tools.

Even VP Joe Biden wants in on the action, threatening Moscow by saying,”We’re sending a message. We have the capacity to do it.”  Presumably, he’s referring to a cyber ‘counter attack’ by Washington.

It seems that where ever you turn nowadays, someone in Washington is issuing a threat against Russia. Are US-Russian relations really that bad, or does this trend have more to do with the defense industry and power struggles within the US?

What was previously a stance reserved for right-wing neoconservative hawks and Cold War hold-outs has now infected America’s left-wing, and is a firm plank in the Democratic Party platform, as evidenced by Hillary Clinton’s constant anti-Russian rhetoric throughout this 2016 election cycle. Along with the White House, Clinton has now transformed the Democrats into the vanguard of Washington’s new anti-Russia movement.

On July 27th, Josh Rogin from the Washington Post wrote, “The Clinton campaign has decided to escalate its rhetoric on Russia. After Trump suggested Wednesday that if Russia had indeed hacked Clinton’s private email server it should release the emails, the Clinton campaign sent out its Democratic surrogates to bash Russia and Trump in a manner traditionally reserved for Republicans.”

Anyone who was paying attention back then knew this ‘Russian hack’ talking point was purely political, but then again, who’s really paying attention these days? Certainly not the US media.

You can trace the genesis of the Democratic Party’s hardcore anti-Russian strategy back to when President Vladimir Putin made a mild passing remark about Donald Trump’s GOP primary success. From that point on, Trump’s political opponents saw this as an open target. In their words, ‘comparing one dictator to another.’

Never one to pass up an opportunity to score cheap political points, President Obama got in on the act, intensifying the Trump-Putin narrative to the level of bromance. “If you’ve made a career out of idealizing Ronald Reagan, then where were you when your own party’s nominee for president was kissing up to Vladimir Putin?” said Obama on Oct 20th at a Clinton rally in Miami.

obamaBacked by the Obama White House, Clinton and the media felt they had a green light to keep pressing ahead with blaming Russia – not only for the controversial DNC leaks, but also for hacking into US election systems in Arizona – a charge devoid of any evidence other than innuendo and speculation. The media’s coverage on this issue was deceptive from the onset. In a leading news release, entitled, Russian hackers targeted Arizona election system,” we can see how after the cock-sure headline, the first paragraph would always sound definitive:

“Hackers targeted voter registration systems in Illinois and Arizona, and the FBI alerted Arizona officials in June that Russians were behind the assault on the election system in that state.”

But then by the time you advanced down the story, the report would quickly retreat into a zone of uncertainty:

“The bureau described the threat as “credible” and significant, “an eight on a scale of one to 10,” Matt Roberts, a spokesman for Arizona Secretary of State Michele Reagan (R), said Monday. As a result, Reagan shut down the state’s voter registration system for nearly a week.”

And then, down to almost nothing…

“It turned out that the hackers had not compromised the state system or even any county system. They had, however, stolen the username and password of a single election official in Gila County.”

At no point was any evidence ever given. Only ambiguous statements like, “Cyber security officials agree that this looks very much like a Russian government-directed hack.”

Are American politicians so callous as to tempt geopolitical conflict in order to further their short-term political ambitions? Better yet, has American political life really arrived in such a dark cul de sac (translated in French: ‘bottom of the bag’) where politicians in power are so insecure as to make-up and propagate wild international conspiracy theories – in the middle a national election cycle? It’s a very depressing prospect, and yet, this is exactly what we are seeing in this 2016 Presidential Election.

Behind Clinton’s wild hyperbolic rants about the Kremlin and Wikileaks, you will find the White House… 

On October 7th, the Obama Administration formally accused the Russian government of stealing emails from the Democratic National Committee and other high-profile individuals including Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta – giving them to Wikileaks. 

Soon, there was a queue of ‘national security’ politicians eager to hitch a ride on this bandwagon. Senator Ben Sasse (NE-R), a member of the Homeland Security Committee spouted out, “Russia must face serious consequences. Moscow orchestrated these hacks because [Russian President Vladimir] Putin believes Soviet-style aggression is worth it. The United States must upend Putin’s calculus with a strong diplomatic, political, ­cyber and economic response.”

According to a Washington Post report by technology editor, Ellen Nakashima, the only ‘evidence’ that seems to be available on this story is a corporate analysis of the alleged ‘Russian government hacks’ – provided by a US cyber security company called Crowdstrike. No actual specifics are given, so we are meant to take private firm Crowdstrike’s word for it.

screen-shot-2016-11-01-at-02-50-39

IMAGE: Crowdstrike cyber security.

The Post’s Nakashima then added:

“The administration also blamed Moscow for the hack of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the subsequent leak of private email addresses and cellphone numbers of Democratic lawmakers.”

An online persona calling himself Guccifer 2.0 has claimed responsibility for posting the material. Those sites and that persona are “consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts,” the joint statement said. “… We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”

Moscow’s press secretary’s reply: “This is some sort of nonsense,” said Dmitry Peskov.

Despite the constant repetition by Democrat media surrogates, and as CNN’s Maria Cardona said last night, no US national intelligence agency has really “confirmed” that Russia was behind the email hacks – and still no evidence, other than speculative guesswork, has been presented.

Likewise, US intelligence agencies have never actually said definitively on record that “Russia did it,” thus, leaving the door open to walk-back the accusation at a later date. Standard Washington procedure of ambiguity. This little detail doesn’t seem to matter in this hyperbolic political climate though. It seems that the White House, Hillary Clinton and media operatives like Cardona – are quite happy living in what John Kerry recent dubbed as a ‘parallel universe.’

The announcement, albeit vague, actually originated from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

Still, during the final Presidential debate, Hillary Clinton proudly crowed how “17 US intelligence agenciesaka the “Intelligence Community” – all agreed that Russia did it. 

“We have 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military, who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyberattacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin, and they are designed to influence our election,” said Clinton. “I find that deeply disturbing.”

What’s even more disturbing is the fact that Clinton is lying in front of a national audience. The highest levels of the Kremlin? Here are Clinton’s ’17 agencies’:

Air Force Intelligence, Army Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, Coast Guard Intelligence, Defense Intelligence Agency, Energy Department, Homeland Security Department, State Department, Treasury Department, Drug Enforcement Administration, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Marine Corps Intelligence, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, National Reconnaissance Office, National Security Agency, Navy Intelligence and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

What does the Coast Guard Intelligence, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency or the Drug Enforcement Administration know about John Podesta’s emails? Answer: nothing.

The exact same thing happened following Wikileaks first trove of DNC emails back in July 2016. The US government issued a vague accusatory statement, but would not actually name the culprit. Some might call that propaganda.

In both instances, the Obama Administration refused to present any evidence. Translated: there was no evidence. If there had been, the White House would have been shouting from the rooftops and using it as leverage to apply muscle in the UN over Washington’s  flagging efforts in Syria. Both Obama Administration announcements were nothing more than dog whistles for Democrats and “journalists” working for hopelessly partisan outlets like New York Times and CNN – none of whom have bothered to press the White House for one ounce of evidence pertaining to the Party’s decree that “Russia is hacking the US election process.”

If you actually look at the joint DNI-DHS statement issued on the matter, it contains no definitive statement: 

“… [the hacks] are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow — the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”

According to NSA intelligence worker-turned whistleblower William Binney, when asked about WikiLeaks and whether the Russians are ‘hacking’ US elections, he concluded that the cyber efforts against the DNC were more likely to be the work of a “disgruntled U.S. intelligence worker.

Under partisan pressure from senior Democrat Senator Harry Reid, the FBI also initiated another investigation into “people linked to the Trump team with Russia.” Reid was unset about the DNC hacks and the Podesta emails and demanded the FBI do something about the Trump campaign. To date, the FBI haven’t come up with anything.

To be fair, Hillary would have every reason to believe that the Kremlin is behind the hack – because her staff read it to her from the campaign’s daily intelligence briefings, presumably, supplied from the US government’s much vaunted Intelligence Community. Of course, that’s the same Intelligence Community that briefed George W Bush about Saddam’s nonexistent nuclear weapons program, and who also briefed Colin Powell about Iraq’s imaginary “Winnebagos of Death” aka mobile anthrax labs disguised as senior double-wide camper vans. So, of course, they would know if Putin directed the DNC leaks and Podesta email hacks.

For those us who are skeptical of the great oxymoron known as ‘Washington Intelligence,’ I can almost hear the mainstream rebuttal now, “No, that was Iraq, that was Bush. We’re not like that. No, this time it’s different. This time we are sure the Russians did it!”

1-north-korea-hack-unit-121
In 2014, Obama claimed that Kim’s notorious “Bureau 121” hacked into Sony Pictures. 

This isn’t the first time that President Obama has cried wolf on a foreign ‘hack’ and then tried to sell it for political purposes. Back in December 2014, Obama claimed that North Korea had hacked Sony Pictures in Hollywood. Pentagon-CIA media proxy CNN quickly chimed in to support Washington’s conspiracy theory, floating a colorful story that Kim Jing-Un had deployed a secret underground hacking unit called Bureau 121.’ Just like with today’s “Russian Hack” theory, no member of the mainstream press dared to question the White House’s ridiculous North Korean claim, and like the ‘Russian Hack’ claims, the only source cited for Sony hack was analysis provided by US firm Crowdstrike.

Jumping the Shark

After their Democratic Party Convention on July 27th, the Clinton campaign machine put all of its chips on their Putin narrative.

Soon after, a cadre of top Clinton national security surrogates then accused Trump of emboldening Russia in their evil plot to “destabilize and dominate the West.”  Tom Donilon, a former national security adviser then accused Russia of ‘interfering’ with elections all over Europe and then accused Trump is helping Russia directly. At that point, they were in too deep to turn back.

Clinton spin doctors Josh Schwerin and Michael Fallon would stoop even lower by accusing RT of having possession of the Podesta emails even before Wikileaks did. Their only ‘evidence’ seemed to be Twitter posts by RT News which Clinton held up as ‘proof’ that the Kremlin was front-running Wikileaks email dumps. The Clinton braintrust failed to note that the Podesta emails were posted on Wikileaks own website well before RT News had tweeted about them. At that point it became obvious that the Clinton campaign was panicking and hysterically grabbing for any excuse they could get their hands on. We then watched, as one RT reporter after another dismantled the Clinton campaign’s desperate claims. It was embarrassing. They could not face the uncomfortable fact that it was WikiLeaks head Julian Assange who chose the timing of the release of the DNC and Podesta emails. Rather than attack Assange himself, who happens to be popular with millennials (the very group Clinton struggles to connect with), her operatives opted to target Russia and Trump instead. Either way, the political strategy here is clear – to shoot the messenger. The Clinton campaign is stuck in permanent rear-guard mode, because based on the content of both the DNC Leaks, Wikileaks files, and Project Veritas video – their own Democratic Party has been discredited and exposed as a corrupt political organization. Their other big problem is that despite all the outrage from Democrats and their mainstream media surrogates, none of the leaked content has been challenged on the basis of its authenticity. The results speak for themselves. The initial DNC leak of 20,000 emails resulted in the resignation of DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. They revealed the unthinkable: the Democratic National Committee actively worked to undermine the Presidential campaign of Bernie Sanders in favor of the establishment choice in Hillary Clinton. Sanders never had a chance. Honest commentators called this an affront to the democratic process, while party insiders and Clinton supporters pretended to be aloof as if it never happened. To prove this point, both President Obama and Hillary Clinton then gave Wasserman-Schultz a glowing endorsement on the way out. “For the last eight years, Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz has had my back. This afternoon, I called her to let her know that I am grateful,” said Obama. Not surprisingly, Clinton thanked Wasserman Schultz, presumably for helping to knock her only competitor Sanders out of the Democrat primary race. “I am grateful to Debbie for getting the Democratic Party to this year’s historic convention in Philadelphia, and I know that this week’s events will be a success thanks to her hard work and leadership,” said Clinton. The party had sold its soul to devil and no one seemed to care too much about it. Party Meltdown Wasserman Schultz’s replacement didn’t fair much better. DNC Vice Chairwoman Donna Brazile was installed to serve as interim chair through the remainder election, but Brazile was soon skewered by subsequent Wikileaks batches – showing how, on more than one occasion, she fed debate questions obtained from corrupt mainstream media operatives – straight to Hillary Clinton. A March 12 email exchange shows Brazile stating that she received a town hall question from Roland Martin, a TV One host who co-moderated a March 13 town hall with CNN’s Jake Tapper.” A March 5 email shows that she shared a question with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and communications director Jennifer Palmieri that was to be asked in a March 6 debate hosted by CNN in Flint, Mich.” (Source: Daily Caller) Brazile’s audacious fraud also helped contribute to her party’s planned sabotage of Democrat challenger Bernie Sanders. Watch Brazile go into full meltdown when confronted here: . Completely corrupt and still, Brazile even had to temerity to deny doing it when pressed on FOX News last week. Brazile’s reputation is so bad now that even CNN has severed ties with her – and that’s saying a lot. In addition, it was also revealed how CNN’s head political commentator, Gloria Borger, was named by Podesta as one of a shortlist of ‘journalists’ the Clinton campaign would “work with” to gain favorable coverage. You’d think that CNN would have dropped Borger after this was revealed, but no. Amazingly, Borger is still leading CNN’s election coverage. Clearly, CNN cannot be trusted to police itself when it comes to matters of outright collusion with Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party.


Worse Than Watergate

Perhaps a bigger scandal which the Obama White House and Clinton campaign operatives would like to bury – is the FBI’s investigation into the Clinton Foundation. Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal confirmed the existence of an internal feud between the FBI and the Justice Department, over whether or not to pursue an investigation into Clinton issue:

“Some investigators grew frustrated, viewing FBI leadership as uninterested in probing the charity, these people said. Others involved disagreed sharply, defending FBI bosses and saying Mr. McCabe in particular was caught between an increasingly acrimonious fight for control between the Justice Department and FBI agents pursuing the Clinton Foundation case. It isn’t unusual for field agents to favor a more aggressive approach than supervisors and prosecutors think is merited. But the internal debates about the Clinton Foundation show the high stakes when such disagreements occur surrounding someone who is running for president.”

There’s more. It was also revealed last week how Jill McCabe, the wife of FBI Deputy Director, Andrew McCabe, received $467,500 in campaign funds in late 2015 for her Virginia State Senate run. This unusually large donation came via a political action committee run by Virginia Gov.Terry McAuliffe – a Clinton Foundation board member. After the funds were donated, Andrew McCabe was then put in charge of the Clinton Email case. In normal times, this one scandal would be bigger than Watergate, but these are not normal times.

So why is Washington going all out to deflect to Russia, and cover-up the Clinton scandals, and the Wikileaks document dumps? One reason is because the Clinton email issue goes all the way to the top – to the President himself.

What 21WIRE reported on Oct 21st is how President Obama lied when first confronted about whether or not he knew about the existence of Hillary’s unauthorized private server. Obama told CBS News on March 7, 2015 that he only found out about Clinton’s server “the same time everybody else learned it through news reports.” The President’s lie was confirmed when newly released FBI documents showed that:

“Obama used a pseudonym [bobama@ameritech.net] when communicating with then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by email, and at least one of those emails ended up on Clinton’s private email server.”

So, not only did Obama lie on national TV, but he also broke strict White House security protocols by carelessly exchanging private emails “off grid” with Hillary Clinton on a unsecured and unauthorized mail server –  maybe to avoid the same scrutiny one would have on a government system. Who knows why he did it.

Sure, he’s not the first US President to lie, but like, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, Obama just joined that exclusive liars club – caught out lying to the American people.

On top of this, any communications made by the President of the United States are de facto labeled as “born classified.”  The same goes for any State Department communications with other foreign ministers.

1_podesta_huma
COVER-UP: John Podesta and Huma Abedin on the Hillary campaign jet (Image: ABC News)

It should be well known by now after watching both Attorney Generals Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch in action – that the Obama Justice Department (DOJ) is one of the most politicized in history. Bear that in mind when looking at the latest leg of the Hillary Email case.

On Friday, FBI Director James Comey set the election alight after announcing that the FBI would be reopening the Clinton email case – currently examining 650,000 emails found while investigating a laptop belonging to former US Congressman Anthony Weiner (estranged husband of top Clinton aid and long-time confidant Huma Abedin) who was snared in a ‘sexting’ scandal, allegedly involving a underaged female. So which DOJ person is in charge of this investigation? None other than Assistant Attorney General Peter J. Kadzik. Who is Kadzik?  Zero Hedge reports:

“Oh yes. Recall our post from last week, “Clinton Campaign Chair Had Dinner With Top DOJ Official One Day After Hillary’s Benghazi Hearing” in which we reported that John Podesta had dinner with one of the highest ranked DOJ officials the very day after Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi testimony? It was Peter Kadzik.”

Oh, and if that wasn’t good enough, Kadzik was also Podesta’s lawyer back in 1998 when Ken Starr was investigating Podesta over his role in helping Bill Clinton intern/mistress Monica Lewinsky land a job at the United Nations. The two were described as ‘best friends.’ FOX News confirms:

“Fantastic lawyer. Kept me out of jail,” Podesta wrote on Sept. 8, 2008 to Obama aide Cassandra Butts, according to emails hacked from Podesta’s Gmail account and posted by WikiLeaks.

To call the Clinton circle incestuous would be an understatement, and on the whole, Americans are sick of it.

Russia – The Party Scapegoat

Former Democratic Party leader Howard Dean was so incensed about the FBI reopening the case, he accused the FBI director of being in league with Russia, Tweeting: “Ironically Comey put himself on the same side as Putin.”


Another veteran party operative and lifetime Clinton defender, James Carville, was so upset by the FBI announcement that he accused “the KGB” working with Republicans to “hijack the election” during his wild rant on MSNBC.

“I think this an outrage and I think the fact that the KGB is involved in this election is an outrage and I think the American people ought to take their democracy back regardless of what the press wants to do and the excuses they want to make for Comey. That’s what I think,” said Carville.

Maybe someone can remind Carville that there is no KGB, and that the Soviet Union actually dissolved in 1991.

1-quote-lavrov

These are just a few scandals surrounding the Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign, along with the many exposés revealed through Wikileaks, and the Podesta email batches. Those are actual scandals with real tangible evidence – unlike the ‘Russians hacking the DNC and John Podesta and passing those to Wikileaks.’ 

Suffice to say, the Democratic Party machine has already demonstrated that it is prepared to say anything in order to deflect and divert attention away from the damning Wikileaks material, and also blame Donald Trump in the process. It should be obvious by now that in their desperation to push a highly comprised Hillary Clinton over the finish line on November 8th, the Washington establishment has concocted the story that ‘Putin is trying to influence our electoral process in the US.’ They’ve tried to lay this at the feet of Donald Trump, who Obama and Clinton claim has some secret special relationship with Vladimir Putin. The liberal mainstream media have made a meal out of this talking point, and anti-Russian war hawks on the Republican side love it too. For the White House and the Clinton campaign this seemed like the ultimate clean sweep – a perfect double entendre.

The geopolitical strategy behind this move was twofold. First, this non event would be used to advance immediate calls for  sanctions against Russia. Secondly, the US could continue to lean on Russia in the UN over Syria. Previously, 21WIRE reported how Washington’s State Dept and UN delegations, led by the dynamic trio of John KerrySamantha Power, and John Kirbyalready lied when levelling charges against Russia for war crimes in Aleppo, and again while accusing Russia and Syria of conducting an airstrike on a UN Aid Convoy in Syria. As we have already shown – that raid was most likely a ground attack carried out of US-backed ‘rebels’ Al Nusra Front, or Nour al-Din al-Zenki.

With so much at stake geopolitically, why would Washington lie about a potential World War III trigger event? If they are prepared to lie about this, what else are they prepared to lie about?

The demonization of all things Russian has definitely accelerated since late 2013 when the US engineered a coup d’etat in Kiev, Ukraine. Ever since that it’s been a go-to talking point for ginning-up and new transaltlantic arms race, as with Republican war hawks – and a convenient scapegoat for any politician requiring misdirection, like Clinton and the Democrats. When the new year rang in 2015, the newly appointed head of the U.S. Broadcasting Board of Governors, Andrew Lack, announced the new challenges facing America’s own state-run media arm that includes U.S. overseas propaganda assets including Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, the Middle East Broadcasting Networks and Radio Free Asia. Lack said, “We are facing a number of challenges from entities like Russia Today which is out there pushing a point of view, the Islamic State in the Middle East and groups like Boko Haram,” He was forced to resign shortly after that.

What’s clear is that when it comes to all things Russian, there is an established pattern of compulsive lying by this US Administration. The list is too long to chronicle here, although ‘Russian-backed Rebles Shootting Down MH17,’ and ‘Assad Regime Sarin Attack in Damascus in 2013‘ certainly comes to mind.

That said, it’s hard to imagine a lie as egregious and potentially destructive than one which accuses the Russia government, a world nuclear power and member of the UNSC, of ‘Hacking Into the US Electoral Process.’ When you examine history however, what you will find is plenty of evidence documenting exactly how the US government and the CIA have altered and flipped 100 foreign elections throughout history, the attempted assassination of over 50 foreign leaders. Knowing all this, one might find it hard to take seriously Washington’s claims that Putin and Trump are trying manipulate the 2016 Election

On Oct 9, 2016, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov laid it all on the table:

“We have witnessed a fundamental change of circumstances when it comes to the aggressive Russophobia that now lies at the heart of U.S. policy towards Russia. It’s not just a rhetorical Russophobia, but aggressive steps that really hurt our national interests and pose a threat to our security.”

Self-serving, career political operatives in Washington are playing a dangerous game. History will mark this as one of the biggest political follies of the Obama-Clinton era.

Knowing what we now know about the NSA and its ability to hack and grab any email or text message from anyone, anywhere – if Washington really wanted to know where the hacks came from, maybe they could start there. Far be it from anyone in Washington or the media to ever adopt that line of inquiry.

Still, we’re waiting for the emergence of an adult in the room in Washington – before it’s too late.

READ MORE ELECTION NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire 2016 Files

SUPPORT 21WIRE – SUBSCRIBE & BECOME A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV

 

Hillary’s ‘Russian Hack’ Hoax: The Biggest Lie of This Election Season.

The Failure of Democracy: How The Oligarchs Plan To “Steal The Election”

The Failure of Democracy: How The Oligarchs Plan To “Steal The Election”

 

 24

 5  3

 37

trump-clinton-1

I am now convinced that the Oligarchy that rules America intends to steal the presidential election. In the past, the oligarchs have not cared which candidate won as the oligarchs owned both. But they do not own Trump.

Most likely you are unaware of what Trump is telling people as the media does not report it.

Video of Trump Statements regarding the Oligarchs

A person who speaks like this is not endeared to the oligarchs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYozWHBIf8g&app=desktop

Who are the oligarchs?

—Wall Street and the mega-banks too big to fail and their agent the Federal Reserve, a federal agency that put 5 banks ahead of millions of troubled American homeowners who the federal reserve allowed to be flushed down the toilet. In order to save the mega-banks’ balance sheets from their irresponsible behavior, the Fed has denied retirees any interest income on their savings for eight years, forcing the elderly to draw down their savings, leaving their heirs, who have been displaced from employment by corporate jobs offshoring, penniless.

—The military/security complex which has spent trillions of our taxpayer dollars on 15 years of gratuitous wars based entirely on lies in order to enrich themselves and their power.

—The neoconservartives whose crazed ideology of US world hegemony thrusts the American people into military conflict with Russia and China.

—The US global corporations that sent American jobs to China and India and elsewhere in order to enrich the One Percent with higher profits from lower labor costs.

—Agribusiness (Monsanto et.al.), corporations that poison the soil, the water, the oceans, and our food with their GMOs, hebicides, pesticides, and chemical fertilizers, while killing the bees that pollinate the crops.

—The extractive industries—energy, mining, fracking, and timber—that maximize their profits by destroying the environment and the water supply.

—The Israel Lobby that controls US Middle East policy and is committing genocide against the Palestinians just as the US committed genocide against native Americans. Israel is using the US to eliminate sovereign countries that stand in Israell’s way.

What convinces me that the Oligarchy intends to steal the election is the vast difference between the presstitutes’ reporting and the facts on the ground.

According to the presstitutes, Hillary is so far ahead that there is no point in Trump supporters bothering to vote. Hillary has won the election before the vote. Hillary has been declared a 93% sure winner.

I am yet to see one Hillary yard sign, but Trump signs are everywhere. Reports I receive are that Hillary’s public appearances are unattended but Trumps are so heavily attended that people have to be turned away. This is a report from a woman in Florida:

“Trump has pulled huge numbers all over FL while campaigning here this week. I only see Trump signs and stickers in my wide travels. I dined at a Mexican restaurant last night. Two women my age sitting behind me were talking about how they had tried to see Trump when he came to Tallahassee. They left work early, arriving at the venue at 4:00 for a 6:00 rally. The place was already over capacity so they were turned away. It turned out that there were so many people there by 2:00 that the doors had to be opened to them. The women said that the crowds present were a mix of races and ages.”

I know the person who gave me this report and have no doubt whatsoever as to its veracity.

I also receive from readers similiar reports from around the country.

This is how the theft of the election is supposed to work:

The media concentrated in a few corporate hands has gone all out to convince not only Americans but also the world, that Donald Trump is such an unacceptable candidate that he has lost the election before the vote.

By controllng the explanation, when the election is stolen those who challenge the stolen election are without a foundation in the media. All media reports will say that it was a run away victory for Hillary over the misogynist immigrant-hating Trump.

And liberal, progressive opinion will be relieved and off guard as Hillary takes us into nuclear war.

That the Oligarchy intends to steal the election from the American people is verified by the officially reported behavior of the voting machines in early voting in Texas. The NPR presstitutes have declared that Hillary is such a favorite that even Republican Texas is up for grabs in the election.

If this is the case, why was it necessary for the voting machines to be programmed to change Trump votes to Hillary votes? Those voters who noted that they voted Trump but were recorded Hillary complained. The election officials, claiming a glitch (which only went one way), changed to paper ballots. But who will count them? No “glitches” caused Hillary votes to go to Trump, only Trump votes to go to Hillary.

The most brilliant movie of our time was The Matrix. This movie captured the life of Americans manipulated by a false reality, only in the real America there is insufficient awareness and no Neo, except possibly Donald Trump, to challenge the system. Americans of all stripes—academics, scholars, journalists, Republicans, Democrats, right-wing, left-wing, US Representatives, US Senators, Presidents, corporate moguls and brainwashed Americans and foreigners—live in a false reality.

In the United States today a critical presidential election is in process in which not a single important issue is addressed by Hillary and the presstitutes. This is total failure. Democracy, once the hope of the world, has totally failed in the United States of America. Trump is correct. The American people must restore the accountability of government to the people.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.

The Failure of Democracy: How The Oligarchs Plan To “Steal The Election” | Global Research – Centre for Research on Globalization.

A Realist’s View Of The US Presidential Contest

Because the viewpoint expressed here will be a controversial one not frequently expressed or encountered, links are provided in order to enable the reader quickly to access the documentation wherever a particular allegation might seem to be dubious on the basis of false assertions that any particular reader might have read elsewhere; but, otherwise, the links that are provided here are intended to be simply ignored, especially because so many of the allegations here are highly contentious and therefore require providing ready access to the documentation (and because no reader should waste his time to read documentation at a linked item that the reader already believes to be true):

The rape-allegations that have been raised recently against Donald Trump, turned the US Presidential contest so drastically, that a Hillary Clinton victory now appears to be all but certain. Morning Consult headlined on October 18th“Donald Trump Has a Growing Problem With Men”, and reported: “Before the first debate, Trump led his Democratic counterpart, Hillary Clinton, by 8 points among men in a Morning Consult survey of likely voters. After the second debate and nine women making sexual assault allegations against Trump, those numbers have nearly flipped: Clinton now leads Trump among men by 6 points.”

That’s a 14% swing away from Trump, among half of the electorate, during a time-interval extending from 24 September to 15 October — 21 days — with only 22 days left until voting ends (hardly enough time to reverse that plunge and then to rise into the lead). Rape allegations couldn’t get Bill Clinton forced out of office, but they likely will force Hillary Clinton into office. Future historians might say that the biggest issue in the 2016 US Presidential contest was rape — more important to voters than the economy, the wars, the income-stagnation of the bottom 99%, trade-policy, criminal-justice reform, or any other public-policy issue. But, if this turns out to be so, then is America at all a functioning democracy? Might it instead be a sick society, whose values are so out-of-kilter, so plainly stupid, that it fits more the stereotype of a backward culture, than of a successful and forward-looking one?

Some of the issues that are actually at stake in this election — especially nuclear war — could quickly end all civilization as we know it; but the voters’ main issue seems instead to be rape. Does this reflect democracy, or rather a lack of democracy, or a manipulation of democracy? Should a personal crime, which isn’t a crime of government, actually be an issue in elective politics? Should it be an issue even if there has been no court-ruling and conviction in the case? And, if it should, then should it dominate an election, such as it is in 2016 America? If it should be an issue at all, then, given the enormous stakes in the current US election, it should be an extremely minor one, notwithstanding how repulsive any rapist is, but especially because there hasn’t even been legal process about any of the allegations, and because even a Presidential candidate who is publicly accused of a personal crime is supposed to be innocent until a court rules “guilty.”

Joachim Hagopian is correct to report, at Global Research, on October 18th, that, “The current threat level to every human life on this planet even surpasses the October Cuban Missile Crisis of 54 years ago as the earth today is in more peril by manmade [nuclear] destruction than any previous time in human history.” However, even if that outcome will fortunately be avoided, the sheer war-stakes in this Presidential election are enormous, and they appear to have little impact upon the voters, other than for them perhaps to fear placing a possible rapist (such as Bill Clinton also was) in charge of US (if not also of other nations’) national security.

Micah Zenko, of the overwhelmingly pro-Hillary-Clinton, neoconservative (pro-invasion)Council on Foreign Relations, headlined, on 29 July 2016, in the neoconservative Foreign Policy magazine (which denies that it’s neoconservative but cannot cite even a single article that it has published attacking neoconservatism), “Hillary the Hawk: A History”, and he documented that, “She has consistently endorsed starting new wars and expanding others.” He closed by saying: “Those who vote for her should know that she will approach such crises with a long track record of being generally supportive of initiating US military interventions and expanding them.”

I have independently reviewed her performance as the US Secretary of State, and have found nothing in her record that would contradict Zenko’s statement (other than his single false word there, ‘generally’), though I wrote clearly as a warning, and not merely (like Zenko did), to describe what her policies have been; I have (on many and diverse occasions) explicitly condemned those invasions as violations not only against the victim-nations but against the American public, whom the US Secretary of State is supposed to represent. International aggression does not represent the interests of the American public. If she becomes America’s President, then clearly there will be war, lots of it.

Hillary Clinton not only ardently championed George W. Bush’s kicking the U.N.’s weapons inspectors out of Iraq in 2003 so that we could invade, but as Secretary of State in the Obama Administration led in every aggressive policy, and her protégés in the State Department after she left, such as Victoria Nuland, oversaw the carrying-out of those acts of aggression, and her former boss President Obama even sometimes overrode his new Secretary of State John Kerry (as Obama never did to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) and approved the aggressive policies of Hillary’s (now Kerry’s) underlings (which humiliated Kerry). Whereas Obama is a quiet neoconservative, Hillary is a loud and proud one. Her support of invading Iraq in 2003 was no ‘mistake’ or ‘aberration’ on her part; it reflected her fundamental orientation toward foreign policy. That’s what her voters will be voting for, if they are intelligent and accurately informed (as opposed to “voting for the first woman President” or other irrelevancies); because that’s what America and the world will importantly get if she becomes the next US President. (After all: Margaret Thatcher was also a woman; gender is irrelevant.) This is clear.

Donald Trump has no record in public office; and, up against Hillary Clinton’s demonstrated catastrophic record in public office, that lack of governmental experience alone constitutes a major reason to prefer him over her in this Presidential election. Whether he would start wars is unknown, but he has spoken forcefully of the need for the US to improve its relations with Russia. Hillary Clinton (like all other neoconservatives) criticizes him for that. (And the US ‘Defense’ industry has poured money into Hillary’s campaign but given almost nothing to Trump’s.)

Perhaps the main reason why the main criticisms of Trump have concerned his private life, not his policy-record in public office, is because he has no policy-making record at all. The issues that have been raised in support of Hillary (since her positive achievements in public office have been virtually nil) have mainly focused on Trump’s personal affairs, and on his alleged acts of bigotry and even rape, because these are matters that distract voters from the real and urgent issues, which weigh so heavily and so substantially against her candidacy.

Rape has become the chief focus during the campaign’s closing days, because polls have indicated clearly that voters are more concerned about whether their President is a rapist than about whether he or she is a warmonger. Though they weren’t so concerned about such allegations when Bill Clinton was President, Trump’s often-crude speech makes such accusations against him far more credible than in Bill Clinton’s case — even though that ought not to be so.

No one except the women who have accused Bill Clinton and Donald Trump of rape can know, or can even think they know, whether a court would have convicted the alleged rapist if a court had been enabled to issue such a decision; but there can be no doubt whatsoever, that Hillary Clinton has been actively supporting the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, the US invasion of Libya in 2011, and is now supporting a far more aggressive US invasion of Syria (which would mean war against Russia) — supporting it consistently. She also has actively supported the 2009 coup in Honduras (which replaced the progressive democratically elected President there by a string of fascist tyrants and the world’s highest murder-rate), and the overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically elected government in 2014 (which was immediately followed by a break-up of the country and a plunge into depression and soaring debt).

Each one of these invasions and coups produced even worse conditions in the invaded or overthrown country afterward; but, only in the single case, of the invasion of Iraq by George W. Bush, which subsequently became overwhelmingly condemned by the Democratic Party itself, did Hillary Clinton (with whatever sincerity an intelligent person can attribute to her, which is whatever the person thinks it to be) admit that she had made a ‘mistake’ on that one occasion. She doesn’t apologize for any of the other cases, because there is no such political requirement for her to do so.

How many times does a high public official need to repeat essentially the same ‘mistake’ (actively as a public official pushing for horrific invasions), before the voters in that person’s political party (in this case, Democrats) come to recognize that they’ve been consistently lied-to by that person, and that they’ve been that politician’s suckers by voting for that catastrophically war-mongering person? After all, no sane voter wants America to go to war against Russia. But that’s the direction in which we’re currently heading. And Hillary Clinton wants to go farther there.

America’s Presidential choice will be either Hillary Clinton, a proven and repeated warmonger who has left a lengthy trail of death and destruction behind her as her blood-soaked clear and consistent record in public office (and Zenko made special note that “She also has developed close relations with retired military officers like Gen. Jack Keane, who has rarely seen a country that cannot be improved with US ground troops and airstrikes. As Bob Woodward wrote of a 2009 meeting between the two to discuss the Afghan surge: ‘Clinton greeted Keane with a bear hug, astonishing [US envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard] Holbrooke because — and he should know — Hillary rarely bear-hugged anyone.” (Here is Jack Keane being praised by the prominent super-neocon Republican Paul Wolfowitz, who will vote for Hillary Clinton, against Donald Trump.)

Or else it will be a possible rapist, like her husband also was, who served two terms in the White House, but this time it would be a man of the opposite political party: Donald Trump. No matter how gross Mr. Trump is: he, unlike Hillary Clinton, cannot be intelligently evaluated by an abysmal record in public office, because he simply has no record at all in public office, nothing whatsoever; but he has only strings of public statements, most of which contradict each other. (As Zenko said: “Unlike Donald Trump, who has wildly shifting positions and alleged ‘secret’ plans to defeat the Islamic State, Clinton has an extensive track record upon which one can evaluate her likely positions.”) What Hillary Clinton’s public statements contradict is her actual record in public office, which is as far right-wing (pro-international-corporate), especially in foreign affairs and US trade policy (including NAFTA, TTIP, etc.) (and the common term for this in the military sphere is “neoconservative”), as any of her many financial backers on Wall Street could realistically hope for from any potential future US President — which is why she’s backed by almost all of America’s billionaires.

One of those two persons will be the next US President. Anyone else who alleges that he or she wants to be, and whose name will also appear on the Presidential ballot, is just a fake there, because, for example, Ralph Nader never ever won even so much as a single one of the 50 states in the Electoral College in any of his contests for the Presidency (not to mention a majority of all the EC votes, such as each of these spoilers lies, or lied, to claim to be his or her goal, but really just being a bad joke on that person’s voters). Nor will any of the current aspiring Presidential spoilers win even a single state.

It’s going to be either the possible rapist, or else the definite and serial warmonger. The next US President will be one of those two people. On the one side is, maybe, a rapist. On the other side is certainly a warmonger.

Each voter must make his/her own choice: either drink possibly cyanide, or drink definitely arsenic. Those are the only two choices left in America’s ‘democracy’, and neither of them was the top choice of the most Americans during the primaries-season: the top choice was Bernie Sanders, and the second choice was John Kasich. In a truly democratic system, those two would be the final contestants.

Each and every American voter in this existing contest will either select and drink his/her cup, or else simply allow all the other US voters in this contest collectively to select the cup that he/she and all other Americans will then be drinking during the next four years.

That’s a realistic view of this contest. But this is only one person’s analysis. Anyone who finds fault in it, is welcomed to provide and document a counter-argument below, as a reader-comment, or anywhere else this commentary is published.

Meanwhile, here is my answer to a person who, in a prior reader-comment, said that I am trying to ‘herd’ America’s voters into one or the other of America’s rotten political parties: I voted for Bernie Sanders, but I’m no such fool as to think that anyone like that still has a chance to win the US Presidency in 2016. I didn’t do the ‘herd’ing here; the US political system does it, when the political primary season ends and the general-election contest starts. If Jill Stein had wanted to reform the Democratic Party, she missed her chance to do that when she failed even to enter the Democratic primaries.

And, unlike the Whig Party, which had already become so widely rejected by the electorate by the time of 1860, so that a former Whig, Abraham Lincoln, was able virtually to start its successor, the Republican Party in 1860 (which got shot dead and taken over by the aristocracy when he was shot dead, in 1865), America’s voters haven’t yet reached the point where they’re willing to replace the Democratic Party with the Green Party or any other (much less to protect it if yet another assassination kills the progressive replacement-party like Lincoln’s Republican Party was). No matter what any third-party proponent might say, there’s no chance that 2016 is going to be some repeat of 1860. America is, and (like any nation that has a Presidential system) can only be, a two-party political system. The Founders didn’t know that, but we’ve now got hundreds of years all proving it to be so.

I mention that particular objection because it’s the one I most commonly have gotten in the past.

One final observation here: The reality of politics and governmental policymaking is incredibly ugly, and anyone who makes voting decisions on the basis of a politician’s mere private and personal life is a fool, because public policy really is, in the deepest sense, a very different and vastly more consequential and important moral sphere, having shockingly little to do with the person’s private behavior. The only intelligent way to judge any candidate is by that person’s past record of actual policy-decisions in public office, not at all by either the person’s mere words, or his private life (such as described in this example).

Even for Abraham Lincoln, who (along with FDR) is considered by historians to have been the greatest President, only his actions on policy made him that, and even his greatness as a rhetorician possesses relevance for historians only insofar as it was a part of that policy-record. Furthermore: both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson owned and ordered slaves, but neither man was a lesser President for having done that (even if historians do debate whether such Presidents were lesser persons for having done it).

To evaluate a politician by either his personal life or his mere rhetoric is not only foolish but petty. History proves this on thousands, if not millions, of occasions. Policy-actions are the only factor that’s important when evaluating a politician. It has been true throughout human history. A politician who has no record of policy-actions is thus a zero (like a mere coin-flip: presuming one side to be positive, the other negative); a politician who has a bad policy-record is thus a negative, and a politician who (like Bernie Sanders) has a positive policy-record is thus a positive. No intelligent estimation of America’s immediate political future can be positive; it’s either zero (like Trump) or else negative (like Hillary). That’s where we are (somewhere between zero and negative), and that’s the real choice we’ve been presented: either it’s Trump (zero), or else it’s Hillary (negative). I, a Sanders-voter, am choosing Trump, in preference to Clinton.

*  *  *

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

 

A Realist’s View Of The US Presidential Contest | Zero Hedge.

#StopSoros and his Smartmatic Voting Machines from Rigging the Election!

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/6c/18/92/6c1892d37b0eb2cb272f88eb224680ac.jpg
#StopSoros and his Smartmatic Voting Machines from Rigging the Election!

 

========================================================================

 

 

(More info HERE: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/57gne4/red_alert_vice_chairman_of_george_soros_highly/)

 

 

TLDR: Soros shills OWN the Smartmatic Voting Machine companies. He’s trying to RIG THE ELECTION.

 

 

I made a staggering discovery: States don’t care about this. Voting machines are handled at the LOCAL COUNTY LEVEL.

 

 

Each county should have a CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE in its voting machine contracts.

 

 

Call them and DEMAND paper ballots!

 

 

========================================================================

 

 

CTRL+F TO FIND YOUR STATE/COUNTY! (List will be updated as we compile the numbers).

 

 

DO NOT ASSUME SOMEONE ELSE CALLED FIRST. PUT AS MUCH PRESSURE ON THEM AS POSSIBLE. OVERWHELM THEM!

 

 

========================================================================

 

 

Need a script to speak when you call? FOLLOW THIS:

 

 

Hi! My name is _______ and I’m a citizen of _______ County. I’m calling today because it’s recently come out in the news that Mark Malloch-Brown, the Vice Chairman of Smartmatic voting machines, is also the Vice Chairman of George Soros’ Open Society Foundation – and the Open Society Foundation is one of Hillary’s largest supporters. This is a huge conflict of interest, and jeopardizes the results of our election. We must not allow our election to be influenced by foreign actors and private companies. What we need to do immediately is exercise our Conflict of Interest Clause in our voting machine contract, and switch to the fallback voting process, and paper ballots. This alone will keep our election open, honest, and accurate.

 

 

========================================================================

 

 

THIS IS A GROUND WAR! GET MARCHING!

 

 

========================================================================

 

 

Arizona

 

 

Apache County Board of Elections    St. Johns, AZ 85936 928-337-7537

 

Cochise County Board of Elections   Bisbee, AZ 85603    520-432-8970

 

Coconino County Board of Elections  Flagstaff, AZ 86001 928-679-7860

 

Gila County Board of Elections  Globe, AZ 85501 928-402-8708

 

Graham County Board of Elections    Safford, AZ 85546   928-792-5037

 

Greenlee County Board of Elections  Clifton, AZ 85533   928-865-2072

 

La Paz County Board of Elections    Parker, AZ 85344    928-669-6115

 

Maricopa County Board of Elections  Phoenix, AZ 85003   602-506-1511

 

Mohave County Board of Elections    Kingman, AZ 86402   928-753-0733

 

Navajo County Board of Elections    Holbrook, AZ 86025  928-524-4285

 

Pima County Board of Elections  Tucson, AZ 85756    520-724-6830

 

Pinal County Board of Elections Florence, AZ 85132  520-866-6830

 

Santa Cruz County Board of Elections    Nogales, AZ 85621   520-375-7800

 

Yavapai County Board of Elections   Prescott, AZ 86305  928-771-3250

 

Yuma County Board of Elections  Yuma, AZ 85364  928-373-1014

 

 

California

 

 

Alameda County Board of Elections   Oakland, CA 94612   510-272-6933

 

Alpine County Board of Elections    Markleeville, CA 96120  530-694-2281

 

Amador County Board of Elections    Jackson, CA 95642   209-223-6465

 

Butte County Board of Elections Oroville, CA 95965  530-538-7761

 

Calaveras County Board of Elections San Andreas, CA 95249   209-754-6376

 

Colusa County Board of Elections    Colusa, CA 95932    530-458-0500

 

Contra Costa County Board of Elections  Martinez, CA 94553  925-335-7800

 

Del Norte County Board of Elections Crescent, CA 95531  707-464-7216

 

El Dorado County Board of Elections Placerville, CA 95667   530-621-7480

 

Fresno County Board of Elections    Fresno, CA 93721    559-600-8683

 

Glenn County Board of Elections Willows, CA 95988   530-934-6414

 

Humboldt County Board of Elections  Eureka, CA 95501    707-445-7481

 

Imperial County Board of Elections  El Centro, CA 92243 760-482-4226

 

Inyo County Board of Elections  Independence, CA 93526  760-878-0224

 

Kern County Board of Elections  Bakersfield, CA 93301   661-868-3590

 

Kings County Board of Elections Hanford, CA 93230   559-582-3211

 

Lake County Board of Elections  Lakeport, CA 95453  707-263-2372

 

Lassen County Board of Elections    Susanville, CA 96130    530-251-8217

 

Los Angeles County Board of Elections   Norwalk, CA 90651   562-466-1310

 

Madera County Board of Elections    Madera, CA 93637    559-675-7720

 

Marin County Board of Elections San Rafael, CA 94913    415-473-6456

 

Mariposa County Board of Elections  Mariposa, CA 95338  209-966-2007

 

Mendocino County Board of Elections Ukiah, CA 95482 707-463-4371

 

Merced County Board of Elections    Merced, CA 95340    209-385-7541

 

Modoc County Board of Elections Alturas, CA 96101   530-233-6205

 

Mono County Board of Elections  Bridgeport, CA 93517    760-932-5537

 

Monterey County Elections   Salinas, CA 93901   831-796-1499

 

Napa County Board of Elections  Napa, CA 94559  707-253-4321

 

Nevada County Board of Elections    Nevada, CA 95959    530-265-1298

 

Orange County Registrar-Voters  Santa Ana, CA 92705 714-567-7600

 

Placer County Board of Elections    Auburn, CA 95604    530-886-5650

 

Plumas County Board of Elections    Quincy, CA 95971    530-283-6256

 

Riverside County Board of Elections Riverside, CA 92507 951-486-7200

 

Sacramento County Board of Elections    Sacramento, CA 95823    916-875-6451

 

San Benito County Board of Elections    Hollister, CA 95023 831-636-4016

 

San Bernardino County Board of Elections    San Bernardino, CA 92415    909-387-8300

 

San Diego County Board of Elections San Diego, CA 92186 858-565-5800

 

San Francisco County Board of Elections San Francisco, CA 94102 415-554-4375

 

San Joaquin County Board of Elections   Stockton, CA 95201  209-468-2885

 

San Luis Obispo County Board of Elections   San Luis Obispo, CA 93408   805-781-5228

 

San Mateo County Board of Elections San Mateo, CA 94402 650-312-5222

 

Santa Barbara County Board of Elections Santa Barbara, CA 93160 805-568-2200

 

Santa Clara County Board of Elections   San Jose, CA 95161  408-299-8683

 

Santa Cruz County Board of Elections    Santa Cruz, CA 95060    831-454-2060

 

Shasta County Board of Elections    Redding, CA 96099   530-225-5730

 

Sierra County Board of Elections    Downieville, CA 95936   530-289-3295

 

Siskiyou County Board of Elections  Yreka, CA 96097 530-842-8084

 

Solano County Board of Elections    Fairfield, CA 94533 707-784-6675

 

Sonoma County Board of Elections    Santa Rosa, CA 95406    707-565-6800

 

Stanislaus County Board of Elections    Modesto, CA 95354   209-525-5200

 

Sutter County Board of Elections    Yuba, CA 95993  530-822-7122

 

Tehama County Board of Elections    Red Bluff, CA 96080 530-527-8190

 

Trinity County Board of Elections   Weaverville, CA 96093   530-623-1220

 

Tulare County Board of Elections    Visalia, CA 93277   559-624-7300

 

Tuolumne County Board of Elections  Sonora, CA 95370    209-533-5570

 

Ventura County Board of Elections   Ventura, CA 93009   805-654-2781

 

Yolo County Elections   Woodland, CA 95695  530-666-8133

 

Yuba County Board of Elections  Marysville, CA 95901    530-749-7855

 

 

Colorado

 

 

Adams County Board of Elections Brighton, CO 80601  720-523-6500

 

Alamosa County Board of Elections   Alamosa, CO 81101   719-589-6681

 

Arapahoe County Board of Elections  Littleton, CO 80120 303-795-4511

 

Archuleta County Board of Elections Pagosa Springs, CO 81147    970-264-8331

 

Baca County Board of Elections  Springfield, CO 81073   719-523-4372

 

Bent County Board of Elections  Las Animas, CO 81054    719-456-2009

 

Boulder County Board of Elections   Boulder, CO 80301   303-413-7740

 

Broomfield County Board of Elections    Broomfield, CO 80020    303-464-5857

 

Chaffee County Board of Elections   Salida, CO 81201    719-539-4004

 

Cheyenne County Board of Elections  Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810    719-767-5685

 

Clear Creek County Board of Elections   Georgetown, CO 80444    303-679-2339

 

Conejos County Board of Elections   Conejos, CO 81129   719-376-5422

 

Costilla County Board of Elections  San Luis, CO 81152  719-672-3301

 

Crowley County Board of Elections   Ordway, CO 81063    719-267-5225

 

Custer County Board of Elections    Westcliffe, CO 81252    719-783-2441

 

Delta County Board of Elections Delta, CO 81416 970-874-2449

 

Denver County Board of Elections    Denver, CO 80204    720-913-8683

 

Dolores County Board of Elections   Dove Creek, CO 81324    970-677-2381

 

Douglas County Board of Elections   Castle Rock, CO 80109   303-660-7444

 

Eagle County Board of Elections Eagle, CO 81631 800-225-6136

 

El Paso County Board of Elections   Colorado Springs, CO 80907  719-520-6222

 

Elbert County Board of Elections    Kiowa, CO 80117 303-621-3127

 

Fremont County Board of Elections   Cañon, CO 81212    719-276-7340

 

Garfield County Board of Elections  Glenwood Springs, CO 81601  970-384-3700

 

Gilpin County Board of Elections    Central, CO 80427   303-582-5321

 

Grand County Board of Elections Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 80451   970-725-3065

 

Gunnison County Board of Elections  Gunnison, CO 81230  970-641-7927

 

Hinsdale County Board of Elections  Lake City, CO 81235 970-944-2228

 

Huerfano County Board of Elections  Walsenburg, CO 81089    719-738-2380

 

Jackson County Board of Elections   Walden, CO 80480    970-723-4334

 

Jefferson County Board of Elections Golden, CO 80401    303-271-8111

 

Kiowa County Board of Elections Eads, CO 81036  719-438-5421

 

Kit Carson County Board of Elections    Burlington, CO 80807    719-346-8638

 

La Plata County Board of Elections  Durango, CO 81303   970-382-6296

 

Lake County Board of Elections  Leadville, CO 80461 719-486-1410

 

Larimer County Board of Elections   Fort Collins, CO 80521  970-498-7820

 

Las Animas County Board of Elections    Trinidad, CO 81082  719-845-2568

 

Lincoln County Board of Elections   Hugo, CO 80821  719-743-2444

 

Logan County Board of Elections Sterling, CO 80751  970-522-1544

 

Mesa County Board of Elections  Grand Junction, CO 81501    970-244-1662

 

Mineral County Board of Elections   Creede, CO 81130    719-658-2440

 

Moffat County Board of Elections    Craig, CO 81625 970-824-9120

 

Montezuma County Board of Elections Cortez, CO 81321    970-565-3728

 

Montrose County Board of Elections  Montrose, CO 81401  970-249-3362

 

Morgan County Board of Elections    Fort Morgan, CO 80701   970-542-3521

 

Otero County Board of Elections La Junta, CO 81050  719-383-3020

 

Ouray County Board of Elections Ouray, CO 81427 970-325-4961

 

Park County Board of Elections  Fairplay, CO 80440  719-836-4333

 

Phillips County Board of Elections  Holyoke, CO 80734   970-854-3131

 

Pitkin County Board of Elections    Aspen, CO 81611 970-920-5180

 

Prowers County Board of Elections   Lamar, CO 81052 719-336-8011

 

Pueblo County Board of Elections    Pueblo, CO 81003    719-583-6620

 

Rio Blanco County Board of Elections    Meeker, CO 81641    970-878-9460

 

Rio Grande County Board of Elections    Del Norte, CO 81132 719-657-3334

 

Routt County Board of Elections Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 970-870-5556

 

Saguache County Board of Elections  Saguache, CO 81149  719-655-2512

 

San Juan County Board of Elections  Silverton, CO 81433 970-387-5671

 

San Miguel County Board of Elections    Telluride, CO 81435 970-728-3954

 

Sedgwick County Board of Elections  Julesburg, CO 80737 970-474-3346

 

Summit County Board of Elections    Breckenridge, CO 80424  970-453-3479

 

Teller County Board of Elections    Cripple Creek, CO 80813 719-689-2951

 

Washington County Board of Elections    Akron, CO 80720 970-345-6565

 

Weld County Board of Elections  Greeley, CO 80631   970-304-6525

 

Yuma County Board of Elections  Wray, CO 80758  970-332-5809

 

 

DC

 

 

District Of Columbia Board of Elections Washington, DC 20001    202-727-2525

 

 

Florida

 

 

Alachua County Board of Elections   Gainesville, FL 32601   352-374-5252

 

Baker County Board of Elections Macclenny, FL 32063 904-259-6339

 

Bay County Board of Elections   Panama, FL 32401    850-784-6100

 

Bradford County Board of Elections  Starke, FL 32091    904-966-6266

 

Brevard County Board of Elections   Melbourne, FL 32941 321-264-6740

 

Broward County Board of Elections   Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301   954-357-7050

 

Calhoun County Board of Elections   Blountstown, FL 32424   850-674-8568

 

Charlotte County Board of Elections Punta Gorda, FL 33950   941-833-5400

 

Citrus County Board of Elections    Inverness, FL 34450 352-341-6740

 

Clay County Board of Elections  Green Cove Springs, FL 32043    904-269-6350

 

Collier County Board of Elections   Naples, FL 34112    239-252-8683

 

Columbia County Board of Elections  Lake, FL 32055  386-758-1026

 

Desoto County Board of Elections    Arcadia, FL 34265   863-993-4871

 

Dixie County Board of Elections Cross City, FL 32628    352-498-1216

 

Duval County Board of Elections Jacksonville, FL 32202  904-630-1414

 

Escambia County Elections Office    Pensacola, FL 32502 850-595-3900

 

Flagler County Board of Elections   Bunnell, FL 32110   386-313-4170

 

Franklin County Board of Elections  Apalachicola, FL 32320  850-653-9520

 

Gadsden County Board of Elections   Quincy, FL 32353    850-627-9910

 

Gilchrist County Board of Elections Trenton, FL 32693   352-463-3194

 

Glades County Board of Elections    Moore Haven, FL 33471   863-946-6005

 

Gulf County Board of Elections  Port Saint Joe, FL 32456    850-229-6117

 

Hamilton County Board of Elections  Jasper, FL 32052    386-792-1426

 

Hardee County Board of Elections    Wauchula, FL 33873  863-773-6061

 

Hendry County Board of Elections    LaBelle, FL 33975   863-675-5230

 

Hernando County Board of Elections  Brooksville, FL 34601   352-754-4125

 

Highlands County Board of Elections Sebring, FL 33871   863-402-6655

 

Hillsborough County Board of Elections  Tampa, FL 33619 813-272-5850

 

Holmes County Board of Elections    Bonifay, FL 32425   850-547-1107

 

Indian River County Board of Elections  Vero Beach, FL 32967    772-226-3440

 

Jackson County Board of Elections   Marianna, FL 32447  850-482-9652

 

Jefferson County Board of Elections Monticello, FL 32344    850-997-3348

 

Lafayette County Board of Elections Mayo, FL 32066  386-294-1261

 

Lake County Supervisor-Elctns   Tavares, FL 32778   352-343-9734

 

Lee County Board of Elections   Fort Myers, FL 33902    239-533-8683

 

Leon County Supervisor of Elections Tallahassee, FL 32301   850-606-8683

 

Levy County Board of Elections  Bronson, FL 32621   352-486-5163

 

Liberty County Board of Elections   Bristol, FL 32321   850-643-5226

 

Madison County Board of Elections   Madison, FL 32340   850-973-6507

 

Manatee County Voter Registration   Bradenton, FL 34205 941-741-3823

 

Marion County Elections Ocala, FL 34470 352-620-3290

 

Martin County Supervisor of Election    Stuart, FL 34994    772-288-5637

 

Miami-Dade County Board of Elections    Miami, FL 33152 305-499-8683

 

Monroe County Board of Elections    Key West, FL 33040  305-292-3416

 

Nassau County Board of Elections    Yulee, FL 32097 904-491-7500

 

Okaloosa County Board of Elections  Crestview, FL 32536 850-689-5600

 

Okeechobee County Board of Elections    Okeechobee, FL 34972    863-763-4014

 

Orange County Board of Elections    Orlando, FL 32856   407-836-2070

 

Osceola County Board of Elections   Kissimmee, FL 34744 407-742-6000

 

Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections   West Palm Beach, FL 33415   561-656-6200

 

Pasco County Board of Elections Dade, FL 33526  352-521-4302

 

Pinellas County Board of Elections  Largo, FL 33773 727-464-8683

 

Polk County Supervisor of Elections Winter Haven, FL 33880  863-534-5888

 

Putnam County Board of Elections    Palatka, FL 32177   386-329-0224

 

Santa Rosa County Board of Elections    Milton, FL 32570    850-983-1900

 

Sarasota County Board of Elections  Sarasota, FL 34230  941-861-8600

 

Seminole County Board of Elections  Sanford, FL 32772   407-585-8683

 

St Johns County Board of Elections  St. Augustine, FL 32095 904-823-2238

 

St Lucie County Board of Elections  Fort Pierce, FL 34947   772-462-1500

 

Sumter County Board of Elections    Bushnell, FL 33513  352-569-1540

 

Suwannee County Board of Elections  Live Oak, FL 32064  386-362-2616

 

Taylor County Board of Elections    Perry, FL 32348 850-838-3515

 

Union County Board of Elections Lake Butler, FL 32054   386-496-2236

 

Volusia County Board of Elections   DeLand, FL 32720    386-736-5930

 

Wakulla County Board of Elections   Crawfordville, FL 32326 850-926-7575

 

Walton County Board of Elections    DeFuniak Springs, FL 32433  850-892-8112

 

Washington County Board of Elections    Chipley, FL 32428   850-638-6230

 

 

Illinois

 

 

Board Of Elections  Location    Phone

 

Adams County Board of Elections Quincy, IL 62301    217-277-2150

 

Alexander County Board of Elections Cairo, IL 62914 618-734-7000

 

Bond County Board of Elections  Greenville, IL 62246    618-664-0449

 

Boone County Board of Elections Belvidere, IL 61008 815-544-3103

 

Brown County Board of Elections Mount Sterling, IL 62353    217-773-3421

 

Bureau County Board of Elections    Princeton, IL 61356 815-875-2014

 

Calhoun County Board of Elections   Hardin, IL 62047    618-576-2351

 

Carroll County Board of Elections   Mount Carroll, IL 61053 815-244-0221

 

Cass County Board of Elections  Virginia, IL 62691  217-452-7217

 

Champaign County Board of Elections Urbana, IL 61802    217-384-3724

 

Christian County Board of Elections Taylorville, IL 62568   217-824-4969

 

Clark County Board of Elections Marshall, IL 62441  217-826-8311

 

Clay County Board of Elections  Louisville, IL 62858    618-665-3626

 

Clinton County Board of Elections   Carlyle, IL 62231   618-594-2464

 

Coles County Board of Elections Charleston, IL 61920    217-348-0523

 

Cook County Board of Elections  Chicago, IL 60602   312-603-0906

 

Crawford County Board of Elections  Robinson, IL 62454  618-544-2590

 

Cumberland County Board of Elections    Toledo, IL 62468    217-849-2631

 

De Witt County Board of Elections   Clinton, IL 61727   217-935-7780

 

Dekalb County Board of Elections    Sycamore, IL 60178  815-895-7149

 

Douglas County Board of Elections   Tuscola, IL 61953   217-253-2411

 

Dupage County Board of Elections    Wheaton, IL 60187   630-407-5600

 

Edgar County Board of Elections Paris, IL 61944 217-466-7433

 

Edwards County Board of Elections   Albion, IL 62806    618-445-2115

 

Effingham County Board of Elections Effingham, IL 62401 217-342-6535

 

Fayette County Board of Elections   Vandalia, IL 62471  618-283-5000

 

Ford County Board of Elections  Paxton, IL 60957    217-379-9400

 

Franklin County Board of Elections  Benton, IL 62812    618-438-3221

 

Fulton County Board of Elections    Lewistown, IL 61542 309-547-3041

 

Gallatin County Board of Elections  Shawneetown, IL 62984   618-269-3025

 

Greene County Board of Elections    Carrollton, IL 62016    217-942-5443

 

Grundy County Board of Elections    Morris, IL 60450    815-941-3222

 

Hamilton County Board of Elections  McLeansboro, IL 62859   618-643-2721

 

Hancock County Board of Elections   Carthage, IL 62321  888-307-2442

 

Hardin County Board of Elections    Elizabethtown, IL 62931 618-287-2251

 

Henderson County Board of Elections Oquawka, IL 61469   309-867-2911

 

Henry County Board of Elections Cambridge, IL 61238 309-937-3575

 

Iroquois County Board of Elections  Watseka, IL 60970   815-432-6960

 

Jackson County Board of Elections   Murphysboro, IL 62966   618-687-7366

 

Jasper County Board of Elections    Newton, IL 62448    618-783-3124

 

Jefferson County Board of Elections Mount Vernon, IL 62864  618-244-8020

 

Jersey County Board of Elections    Jerseyville, IL 62052   618-498-5571

 

Jo Daviess County Board of Elections    Galena, IL 61036    815-777-0161

 

Johnson County Board of Elections   Vienna, IL 62995    618-658-3611

 

Kane County Board of Elections  Geneva, IL 60134    630-232-5990

 

Kankakee County Board of Elections  Kankakee, IL 60901  815-937-2990

 

Kendall County Board of Elections   Yorkville, IL 60560 630-553-4104

 

Knox County Board of Elections  Galesburg, IL 61401 309-345-3815

 

Lake County Board of Elections  Waukegan, IL 60085  847-377-2400

 

Lasalle County Board of Elections   Ottawa, IL 61350    815-434-8202

 

Lawrence County Board of Elections  Lawrenceville, IL 62439 618-943-2346

 

Lee County Board of Elections   Dixon, IL 61021 815-288-3309

 

Livingston County Board of Elections    Pontiac, IL 61764   815-844-2006

 

Logan County Board of Elections Lincoln, IL 62656   217-732-4148

 

Macon County Board of Elections Decatur, IL 62523   217-424-1305

 

Macoupin County Board of Elections  Carlinville, IL 62626   217-854-3214

 

Madison County Board of Elections   Edwardsville, IL 62025  618-692-6290

 

Marion County Board of Elections    Salem, IL 62881 618-548-3400

 

Marshall County Board of Elections  Lacon, IL 61540 309-246-6325

 

Mason County Board of Elections Havana, IL 62644    309-543-6661

 

Massac County Board of Elections    Metropolis, IL 62960    618-524-5213

 

Mcdonough County Board of Elections Macomb, IL 61455    309-833-2474

 

Mchenry County Board of Elections   Woodstock, IL 60098 815-334-4242

 

Mclean County Board of Elections    Bloomington, IL 61701   309-888-5190

 

Menard County Board of Elections    Petersburg, IL 62675    217-632-3201

 

Mercer County Board of Elections    Aledo, IL 61231 309-582-7021

 

Monroe County Board of Elections    Waterloo, IL 62298  618-939-8681

 

Montgomery County Board of Elections    Hillsboro, IL 62049 217-532-9530

 

Morgan County Board of Elections    Jacksonville, IL 62650  217-243-8581

 

Moultrie County Board of Elections  Sullivan, IL 61951  217-728-4389

 

Ogle County Board of Elections  Oregon, IL 61061    815-732-1110

 

Peoria County Board of Elections    Peoria, IL 61602    309-672-6070

 

Perry County Board of Elections Pinckneyville, IL 62274 618-357-5116

 

Piatt County Board of Elections Monticello, IL 61856    217-762-9487

 

Pike County Board of Elections  Pittsfield, IL 62363    217-285-6812

 

Pope County Board of Elections  Golconda, IL 62938  618-683-4466

 

Pulaski County Board of Elections   Mound, IL 62963 618-748-9360

 

Putnam County Board of Elections    Hennepin, IL 61327  815-925-7129

 

Randolph County Board of Elections  Chester, IL 62233   618-826-5000

 

Richland County Board of Elections  Olney, IL 62450 618-392-3111

 

Rock Island County Board of Elections   Rock Island, IL 61201   309-558-3571

 

Saline County Board of Elections    Harrisburg, IL 62946    618-253-8197

 

Sangamon County Board of Elections  Springfield, IL 62701   217-753-6700

 

Schuyler County Board of Elections  Rushville, IL 62681 217-322-4734

 

Scott County Board of Elections Winchester, IL 62694    217-742-3178

 

Shelby County Board of Elections    Shelbyville, IL 62565   217-774-4421

 

St Clair County Board of Elections  Belleville, IL 62220    618-825-2380

 

Stark County Board of Elections Toulon, IL 61483    309-286-5911

 

Stephenson County Board of Elections    Freeport, IL 61032  815-235-8289

 

Tazewell County Board of Elections  Pekin, IL 61554 309-477-2264

 

Union County Board of Elections Jonesboro, IL 62952 618-833-5711

 

Vermilion County Board of Elections Danville, IL 61832  217-554-1900

 

Wabash County Board of Elections    Mount Carmel, IL 62863  618-262-4561

 

Warren County Board of Elections    Monmouth, IL 61462  309-734-8592

 

Washington County Board of Elections    Nashville, IL 62263 618-327-4800

 

Wayne County Board of Elections Fairfield, IL 62837 618-842-5182

 

White County Board of Elections Carmi, IL 62821 618-382-7211

 

Whiteside County Board of Elections Morrison, IL 61270  815-772-5189

 

Will County Board of Elections  Joliet, IL 60432    815-740-4615

 

Williamson County Board of Elections    Marion, IL 62959    618-998-2110

 

Winnebago County Board of Elections Rockford, IL 61101  815-319-4250

 

Woodford County Board of Elections  Eureka, IL 61530    309-467-2822

 

 

Louisiana

 

 

Acadia Parish Board of Elections    Crowley, LA 70526   337-788-8841

 

Allen Parish Board of Elections Oberlin, LA 70655   337-639-4966

 

Ascension Parish Board of Elections Gonzales, LA 70737  225-621-5780

 

Assumption Parish Board of Elections    Napoleonville, LA 70390 985-369-7347

 

Avoyelles Parish Board of Elections Marksville, LA 71351    318-253-7129

 

Beauregard Parish Board of Elections    DeRidder, LA 70634  337-463-7955

 

Bienville Parish Board of Elections Arcadia, LA 71001   318-263-7407

 

Bossier Parish Board of Elections   Benton, LA 71006    318-965-2301

 

Caddo Parish Board of Elections Shreveport, LA 71101    318-226-6891

 

Calcasieu Parish Board of Elections Lake Charles, LA 70601  337-721-4000

 

Caldwell Parish Board of Elections  Columbia, LA 71418  318-649-7364

 

Cameron Parish Board of Elections   Cameron, LA 70631   337-775-5493

 

Catahoula Parish Board of Elections Jonesville, LA 71343    318-744-5745

 

Claiborne Parish Board of Elections Homer, LA 71040 318-927-3332

 

Concordia Parish Board of Elections Vidalia, LA 71373   318-336-7770

 

De Soto Parish Board of Elections   Mansfield, LA 71052 318-872-1149

 

East Baton Rouge Parish Board of Elections  Baton Rouge, LA 70802   225-389-3940

 

East Carroll Parish Board of Elections  Lake Providence, LA 71254   318-559-2015

 

East Feliciana Parish Board of Elections    Clinton, LA 70722   225-683-3105

 

Evangeline Parish Board of Elections    Ville Platte, LA 70586  337-363-5538

 

Franklin Parish Board of Elections  Winnsboro, LA 71295 318-435-4489

 

Grant Parish Board of Elections Colfax, LA 71417    318-627-9938

 

Iberia Parish Board of Elections    New Iberia, LA 70560    337-369-4407

 

Iberville Parish Board of Elections Plaquemine, LA 70764    225-687-5201

 

Jackson Parish Board of Elections   Jonesboro, LA 71251 318-259-2486

 

Jefferson Davis Parish Board of Elections   Jennings, LA 70546  337-824-0834

 

Jefferson Parish Board of Elections New Orleans, LA 70123   504-736-6191

 

Lafayette Parish Board of Elections Lafayette, LA 70501 337-291-7140

 

Lafourche Parish Board of Elections Thibodaux, LA 70301 985-447-3256

 

Lasalle Parish Board of Elections   Jena, LA 71342  318-992-2254

 

Lincoln Parish Board of Elections   Ruston, LA 71270    318-251-5110

 

Livingston Parish Board of Elections    Livingston, LA 70754    225-686-3054

 

Madison Parish Board of Elections   Tallulah, LA 71282  318-574-2193

 

Morehouse Parish Board of Elections Bastrop, LA 71220   318-281-1434

 

Natchitoches Parish Board of Elections  Natchitoches, LA 71457  318-357-2211

 

Orleans Parish Board of Elections   New Orleans, LA 70112   504-658-8300

 

Ouachita Parish Board of Elections  Monroe, LA 71201    318-327-1436

 

Plaquemines Parish Board of Elections   Port Sulphur, LA 70083  504-934-3620

 

Pointe Coupee Parish Board of Elections New Roads, LA 70760 225-638-5537

 

Rapides Parish Board of Elections   Alexandria, LA 71301    318-473-6770

 

Red River Parish Board of Elections Coushatta, LA 71019 318-932-5027

 

Richland Parish Board of Elections  Rayville, LA 71269  318-728-3582

 

Sabine Parish Board of Elections    Many, LA 71449  318-256-3697

 

St Bernard Parish Board of Elections    Chalmette, LA 70043 504-278-4231

 

St Charles Parish Board of Elections    Hahnville, LA 70057 985-783-5120

 

St Helena Parish Board of Elections Greensburg, LA 70441    225-222-4440

 

St James Parish Board of Elections  Convent, LA 70723   225-562-2330

 

St John The Baptist Parish Board of Elections   Laplace, LA 70068   985-652-9797

 

St Landry Parish Board of Elections Opelousas, LA 70570 337-948-0572

 

St Martin Parish Board of Elections St. Martinville, LA 70582   337-394-2204

 

St Mary Parish Board of Elections   Franklin, LA 70538  337-828-4100

 

St Tammany Parish Board of Elections    Covington, LA 70433 985-809-5500

 

Tangipahoa Parish Board of Elections    Amite City, LA 70422    985-748-3215

 

Tensas Parish Board of Elections    St. Joseph, LA 71366    318-766-3931

 

Terrebonne Parish Board of Elections    Houma, LA 70360 985-873-6533

 

Union Parish Board of Elections Farmerville, LA 71241   318-368-8660

 

Vermilion Parish Board of Elections Abbeville, LA 70510 337-898-4324

 

Vernon Parish Board of Elections    Leesville, LA 71446 337-239-3690

 

Washington Parish Board of Elections    Franklinton, LA 70438   985-839-7850

 

Webster Parish Board of Elections   Minden, LA 71055    318-377-9272

 

West Baton Rouge Parish Board of Elections  Port Allen, LA 70767    225-336-2421

 

West Carroll Parish Board of Elections  Oak Grove, LA 71263 318-428-2381

 

West Feliciana Parish Board of Elections    St. Francisville, LA 70775  225-635-6161

 

Winn Parish Board of Elections  Winnfield, LA 71483 318-628-6133

 

 

Michigan

 

 

Alcona County Board of Elections    Harrisville, MI 48740   989-724-9410

 

Alger County Board of Elections Munising, MI 49862  906-387-2076

 

Allegan County Board of Elections   Allegan, MI 49010   269-673-0450

 

Alpena County Board of Elections    Alpena, MI 49707    989-354-9520

 

Antrim County Board of Elections    Bellaire, MI 49615  231-533-6353

 

Arenac County Board of Elections    Standish, MI 48658  989-846-4626

 

Baraga County Board of Elections    L’Anse, MI 49946    906-524-6183

 

Barry County Board of Elections Hastings, MI 49058  269-945-1285

 

Bay County Board of Elections   Bay, MI 48708   989-895-4280

 

Benzie County Board of Elections    Beulah, MI 49617    231-882-9671

 

Berrien County Board of Elections   St. Joseph, MI 49085    269-983-7111

 

Branch County Board of Elections    Coldwater, MI 49036 517-279-4306

 

Calhoun County Board of Elections   Marshall, MI 49068  269-781-0988

 

Cass County Board of Elections  Cassopolis, MI 49031    269-445-4464

 

Charlevoix County Board of Elections    Charlevoix, MI 49720    231-547-7200

 

Cheboygan County Board of Elections Cheboygan, MI 49721 231-627-8808

 

Chippewa County Board of Elections  Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783  906-635-6300

 

Clare County Board of Elections Harrison, MI 48625  989-539-7131

 

Clinton County Board of Elections   St. Johns, MI 48879 989-224-5140

 

Crawford County Board of Elections  Grayling, MI 49738  989-344-3200

 

Delta County Board of Elections Escanaba, MI 49829  906-789-5105

 

Dickinson County Board of Elections Iron Mountain, MI 49801 906-774-0988

 

Eaton County Board of Elections Charlotte, MI 48813 517-543-2426

 

Emmet County Board of Elections Petoskey, MI 49770  231-348-1744

 

Genesee County Board of Elections   Flint, MI 48502 810-257-3224

 

Gladwin County Board of Elections   Gladwin, MI 48624   989-426-7351

 

Gogebic County Board of Elections   Bessemer, MI 49911  906-663-4518

 

Grand Traverse County Board of Elections    Traverse, MI 49684  231-922-4760

 

Gratiot County Board of Elections   Ithaca, MI 48847    989-875-5215

 

Hillsdale County Board of Elections Hillsdale, MI 49242 517-437-3391

 

Houghton County Board of Elections  Houghton, MI 49931  906-482-1150

 

Huron County Board of Elections Bad Axe, MI 48413   989-269-9942

 

Ingham County Board of Elections    Mason, MI 48854 517-676-7255

 

Ionia County Board of Elections Ionia, MI 48846 616-527-5322

 

Iosco County Board of Elections Tawas, MI 48764 989-362-3497

 

Iron County Board of Elections  Crystal Falls, MI 49920 906-875-3221

 

Isabella County Board of Elections  Mount Pleasant, MI 48858    989-772-0911

 

Jackson County Board of Elections   Jackson, MI 49201   517-768-6759

 

Kalamazoo County Board of Elections Kalamazoo, MI 49007 269-383-8840

 

Kalkaska County Board of Elections  Kalkaska, MI 49646  231-258-3300

 

Kent County Board of Elections  Grand Rapids, MI 49503  616-632-7650

 

Keweenaw County Board of Elections  Eagle River, MI 49950   906-337-2229

 

Lake County Board of Elections  Baldwin, MI 49304   231-745-4641

 

Lapeer County Board of Elections    Lapeer, MI 48446    810-245-4863

 

Leelanau County Board of Elections  Suttons Bay, MI 49682   231-256-9824

 

Lenawee County Board of Elections   Adrian, MI 49221    517-264-4599

 

Livingston County Board of Elections    Howell, MI 48843    517-546-8177

 

Luce County Board of Elections  Newberry, MI 49868  906-293-5521

 

Mackinac County Board of Elections  St. Ignace, MI 49781    906-643-7301

 

Macomb County Board of Elections    Mount Clemens, MI 48043 586-469-5209

 

Manistee County Board of Elections  Manistee, MI 49660  231-723-3331

 

Marquette County Board of Elections Marquette, MI 49855 906-225-8330

 

Mason County Board of Elections Ludington, MI 49431 231-843-8202

 

Mecosta County Board of Elections   Big Rapids, MI 49307    231-592-0787

 

Menominee County Board of Elections Menominee, MI 49858 906-863-9968

 

Midland County Board of Elections   Midland, MI 48640   989-832-6739

 

Missaukee County Board of Elections Lake, MI 49651  231-839-4967

 

Monroe County Board of Elections    Monroe, MI 48161    734-240-7020

 

Montcalm County Board of Elections  Stanton, MI 48888   989-831-7339

 

Montmorency County Board of Elections   Atlanta, MI 49709   989-785-8022

 

Muskegon County Board of Elections  Muskegon, MI 49442  231-724-6221

 

Newaygo County Board of Elections   White Cloud, MI 49349   231-689-7235

 

Oakland County Board of Elections   Pontiac, MI 48341   248-858-0560

 

Oceana County Board of Elections    Hart, MI 49420  231-873-4328

 

Ogemaw County Board of Elections    West Branch, MI 48661   989-345-0215

 

Ontonagon County Board of Elections Ontonagon, MI 49953 906-884-2794

 

Osceola County Board of Elections   Reed, MI 49677  231-832-3261

 

Oscoda County Board of Elections    Mio, MI 48647   989-826-1110

 

Otsego County Board of Elections    Gaylord, MI 49735   989-731-7504

 

Ottawa County Board of Elections    West Olive, MI 49460    616-846-8310

 

Presque Isle County Board of Elections  Rogers, MI 49779    800-334-5698

 

Roscommon County Board of Elections Roscommon, MI 48653 989-275-5923

 

Saginaw County Board of Elections   Saginaw, MI 48602   989-790-5251

 

Sanilac County Board of Elections   Sandusky, MI 48471  810-648-3212

 

Schoolcraft County Board of Elections   Manistique, MI 49854    906-341-3618

 

Shiawassee County Board of Elections    Corunna, MI 48817   989-743-2242

 

St Clair County Board of Elections  Port Huron, MI 48060    810-985-2200

 

St Joseph County Board of Elections Centreville, MI 49032   269-467-5603

 

Tuscola County Board of Elections   Caro, MI 48723  989-672-3780

 

Van Buren County Board of Elections Paw Paw, MI 49079   269-657-8200

 

Washtenaw County Board of Elections Ann Arbor, MI 48104 734-222-6730

 

Wayne County Board of Elections Detroit, MI 48226   313-224-6262

 

Wexford County Board of Elections   Cadillac, MI 49601  231-779-9450

 

 

Missouri

 

 

Adair County Board of Elections Kirksville, MO 63501    660-665-3350

 

Andrew County Board of Elections    Savannah, MO 64485  816-324-3624

 

Atchison County Board of Elections  Rock Port, MO 64482 660-744-6214

 

Audrain County Board of Elections   Mexico, MO 65265    573-473-5820

 

Barry County Board of Elections Cassville, MO 65625 417-847-2561

 

Barton County Board of Elections    Lamar, MO 64759 417-682-3529

 

Bates County Board of Elections Butler, MO 64730    660-679-3371

 

Benton County Board of Elections    Warsaw, MO 65355    660-438-7326

 

Bollinger County Board of Elections Marble Hill, MO 63764   573-238-1900

 

Boone County Board of Elections Columbia, MO 65201  573-886-4295

 

Buchanan County Board of Elections  St. Joseph, MO 64501    816-271-1411

 

Butler County Board of Elections    Poplar Bluff, MO 63901  573-686-8050

 

Caldwell County Board of Elections  Kingston, MO 64650  816-586-2571

 

Callaway County Board of Elections  Fulton, MO 65251    573-642-0730

 

Camden County Board of Elections    Camdenton, MO 65020 573-317-3890

 

Cape Girardeau County Board of Elections    Jackson, MO 63755   573-243-3547

 

Carroll County Board of Elections   Carrollton, MO 64633    660-542-0615

 

Carter County Board of Elections    Van Buren, MO 63965 573-323-4527

 

Cass County Board of Elections  Harrisonville, MO 64701 816-380-8102

 

Cedar County Board of Elections Stockton, MO 65785  417-276-6700

 

Adair County Board of Elections Kirksville, MO 63501    660-665-3350

 

Andrew County Board of Elections    Savannah, MO 64485  816-324-3624

 

Atchison County Board of Elections  Rock Port, MO 64482 660-744-6214

 

Audrain County Board of Elections   Mexico, MO 65265    573-473-5820

 

Barry County Board of Elections Cassville, MO 65625 417-847-2561

 

Barton County Board of Elections    Lamar, MO 64759 417-682-3529

 

Bates County Board of Elections Butler, MO 64730    660-679-3371

 

Benton County Board of Elections    Warsaw, MO 65355    660-438-7326

 

Bollinger County Board of Elections Marble Hill, MO 63764   573-238-1900

 

Boone County Board of Elections Columbia, MO 65201  573-886-4295

 

Buchanan County Board of Elections  St. Joseph, MO 64501    816-271-1411

 

Butler County Board of Elections    Poplar Bluff, MO 63901  573-686-8050

 

Caldwell County Board of Elections  Kingston, MO 64650  816-586-2571

 

Callaway County Board of Elections  Fulton, MO 65251    573-642-0730

 

Camden County Board of Elections    Camdenton, MO 65020 573-317-3890

 

Cape Girardeau County Board of Elections    Jackson, MO 63755   573-243-3547

 

Carroll County Board of Elections   Carrollton, MO 64633    660-542-0615

 

Carter County Board of Elections    Van Buren, MO 63965 573-323-4527

 

Cass County Board of Elections  Harrisonville, MO 64701 816-380-8102

 

Cedar County Board of Elections Stockton, MO 65785  417-276-6700

 

Harrison County Board of Elections  Bethany, MO 64424   660-425-6424

 

Henry County Board of Elections Clinton, MO 64735   660-885-7204

 

Hickory County Board of Elections   Hermitage, MO 65668 417-745-6450

 

Holt County Board of Elections  Oregon, MO 64473    660-446-3303

 

Howard County Board of Elections    Fayette, MO 65248   660-248-2284

 

Howell County Board of Elections    West Plains, MO 65775   417-256-2591

 

Iron County Board of Elections  Ironton, MO 63650   573-546-2912

 

Jackson County Board of Elections   Independence, MO 64051  816-325-4600

 

Jasper County Board of Elections    Carthage, MO 64836  417-237-1058

 

Jefferson County Board of Elections Hillsboro, MO 63050 636-797-5486

 

Johnson County Board of Elections   Warrensburg, MO 64093   660-747-6161

 

Knox County Board of Elections  Edina, MO 63537 660-397-2184

 

Laclede County Board of Elections   Lebanon, MO 65536   417-532-5471

 

Lafayette County Board of Elections Lexington, MO 64067 660-259-4315

 

Lawrence County Board of Elections  Mount Vernon, MO 65712  417-466-2638

 

Lewis County Board of Elections Monticello, MO 63457    573-767-5205

 

Lincoln County Board of Elections   Troy, MO 63379  636-528-6300

 

Linn County Board of Elections  Linneus, MO 64653   660-895-5417

 

Livingston County Board of Elections    Chillicothe, MO 64601   660-646-8000

 

Macon County Board of Elections Macon, MO 63552 660-385-2913

 

Madison County Board of Elections   Fredericktown, MO 63645 573-783-2176

 

Maries County Board of Elections    Vienna, MO 65582    573-422-3388

 

Marion County Board of Elections    Palmyra, MO 63461   573-769-2549

 

Mcdonald County Board of Elections  Pineville, MO 64856 417-223-4662

 

Mercer County Board of Elections    Princeton, MO 64673 660-748-3425

 

Miller County Board of Elections    Tuscumbia, MO 65082 573-369-1910

 

Mississippi County Board of Elections   Charleston, MO 63834    573-683-2146

 

Moniteau County Board of Elections  California, MO 65018    573-796-4661

 

Monroe County Board of Elections    Paris, MO 65275 660-327-5106

 

Montgomery County Board of Elections    Montgomery City, MO 63361   573-564-3357

 

Morgan County Board of Elections    Versailles, MO 65084    573-378-5436

 

New Madrid County Board of Elections    New Madrid, MO 63869    573-748-2524

 

Newton County Board of Elections    Neosho, MO 64850    417-451-8221

 

Nodaway County Board of Elections   Maryville, MO 64468 660-582-2251

 

Oregon County Board of Elections    Alton, MO 65606 417-778-7475

 

Osage County Board of Elections Linn, MO 65051  573-897-2139

 

Ozark County Board of Elections Gainesville, MO 65655   417-679-3516

 

Pemiscot County Board of Elections  Caruthersville, MO 63830    573-333-4203

 

Perry County Board of Elections Perryville, MO 63775    573-547-4242

 

Pettis County Board of Elections    Sedalia, MO 65301   660-826-5000

 

Phelps County Board of Elections    Rolla, MO 65401 573-458-6115

 

Pike County Board of Elections  Bowling Green, MO 63334 573-324-2412

 

Platte County Board of Elections    Platte, MO 64079    816-858-3343

 

Polk County Board of Elections  Bolivar, MO 65613   417-326-4031

 

Pulaski County Board of Elections   Waynesville, MO 65583   573-774-4701

 

Putnam County Board of Elections    Unionville, MO 63565    660-947-2674

 

Ralls County Board of Elections New London, MO 63459    573-985-7111

 

Randolph County Board of Elections  Huntsville, MO 65259    660-277-4717

 

Ray County Board of Elections   Richmond, MO 64085  816-776-4502

 

Reynolds County Board of Elections  Centerville, MO 63633   573-648-2494

 

Ripley County Board of Elections    Doniphan, MO 63935  573-996-3215

 

Saline County Board of Elections    Marshall, MO 65340  660-886-3331

 

Schuyler County Board of Elections  Lancaster, MO 63548 660-457-3842

 

Scotland County Board of Elections  Memphis, MO 63555   660-465-7027

 

Scott County Board of Elections Benton, MO 63736    573-545-3549

 

Shannon County Board of Elections   Eminence, MO 65466  573-226-3414

 

Shelby County Board of Elections    Shelbyville, MO 63469   573-633-2181

 

St Charles County Board of Elections    St. Peters, MO 63376    636-949-7550

 

St Clair County Board of Elections  Osceola, MO 64776   417-646-2315

 

St Francois County Board of Elections   Farmington, MO 63640    573-756-5411

 

St Louis County Board of Elections  Maplewood, MO 63143 314-615-1854

 

Ste Genevieve County Board of Elections Ste. Genevieve, MO 63670    573-883-5589

 

Stoddard County Board of Elections  Bloomfield, MO 63825    573-568-3339

 

Stone County Board of Elections Galena, MO 65656    417-357-6127

 

Sullivan County Board of Elections  Milan, MO 63556 660-265-3786

 

Taney County Board of Elections Forsyth, MO 65653   417-546-7202

 

Texas County Board of Elections Houston, MO 65483   417-967-2112

 

Vernon County Board of Elections    Nevada, MO 64772    417-448-2500

 

Warren County Board of Elections    Warrenton, MO 63383 636-456-3331

 

Washington County Board of Elections    Potosi, MO 63664    573-438-6111

 

Wayne County Board of Elections Greenville, MO 63944    573-224-5600

 

Webster County Board of Elections   Marshfield, MO 65706    417-468-2223

 

Worth County Board of Elections Grant City, MO 64456    660-564-2219

 

Wright County Board of Elections    Hartville, MO 65667 417-741-6661

 

 

New Jersey

 

 

Atlantic County Board of Elections  Hamilton, NJ 08330  609-645-5867

 

Bergen County Board of Elections    Hackensack, NJ 07601    201-336-6225

 

Burlington County Board of Elections    Mount Holly, NJ 08060   609-265-5062

 

Camden County Board of Elections    Gloucester, NJ 08012    800-418-9427

 

Cape May County Board Elections Cape May Court House, NJ 08210  609-465-1050

 

Cumberland County Board of Elections    Bridgeton, NJ 08302 856-453-5801

 

Essex County Board of Elections Newark, NJ 07102    973-621-5071

 

Gloucester County Board of Elections    Woodbury, NJ 08096  856-384-4500

 

Hudson County Board of Elections    Jersey, NJ 07302    201-369-3435

 

Hunterdon County Board of Elections Flemington, NJ 08822    908-788-1190

 

Mercer County Board of Elections    Trenton, NJ 08650   609-989-6522

 

Middlesex County Board of Elections New Brunswick, NJ 08901 732-745-3471

 

Monmouth County Board of Elections  Freehold, NJ 07728  732-431-7802

 

Morris County Board of Elections    Morristown, NJ 07960    973-285-8350

 

Ocean County Elections Board    Toms River, NJ 08753    732-929-2167

 

Passaic County Board of Elections   Paterson, NJ 07505  973-881-4527

 

Salem County Board of Elections Salem, NJ 08079 856-935-7510

 

Somerset County Board of Elections  Somerville, NJ 08876    908-231-7084

 

Sussex County Board of Elections    Newton, NJ 07860    973-579-0950

 

Union County Board of Elections Elizabeth, NJ 07208 908-527-4123

 

Warren County Board of Elections    Belvidere, NJ 07823 908-475-6313

 

 

Nevada

 

 

Carson City County Board of Elections   Carson City, NV 89701   775-887-2087

 

Churchill County Board of Elections Fallon, NV 89406    775-423-6028

 

Clark County Board of Elections North Las Vegas, NV 89030   702-455-8683

 

Douglas County Board of Elections   Minden, NV 89423    775-782-9023

 

Elko County Board of Elections  Elko, NV 89801  775-753-4600

 

Esmeralda County Board of Elections Goldfield, NV 89013 775-485-6367

 

Eureka County Board of Elections    Eureka, NV 89316    775-237-5262

 

Humboldt County Board of Elections  Winnemucca, NV 89445    775-623-6343

 

Lander County Board of Elections    Battle Mountain, NV 89820   775-635-5738

 

Lincoln County Board of Elections   Pioche, NV 89043    775-962-5390

 

Lyon County Board of Elections  Yerington, NV 89447 775-463-6501

 

Mineral County Board of Elections   Hawthorne, NV 89415 775-945-2446

 

Nye County Board of Elections   Tonopah, NV 89049   775-482-8127

 

Pershing County Board of Elections  Lovelock, NV 89419  775-273-2208

 

Storey County Board of Elections    Virginia City, NV 89440 775-847-0969

 

Washoe County Board of Elections    Reno, NV 89512  775-328-3670

 

White Pine County Board of Elections    Ely, NV 89301   775-293-6509

 

 

Oregon

 

 

Baker County Board of Elections Baker, OR 97814 541-523-8207

 

Benton County Board of Elections    Corvallis, OR 97330 541-766-6756

 

Clackamas County Board of Elections Oregon, OR 97045    503-655-8510

 

Clatsop County Board of Elections   Astoria, OR 97103   503-325-8511

 

Columbia County Board of Elections  St. Helens, OR 97051    503-397-7214

 

Coos County Board of Elections  Coquille, OR 97423  541-396-7610

 

Crook County Board of Elections Prineville, OR 97754    541-447-6553

 

Curry County Board of Elections Gold Beach, OR 97444    541-247-3297

 

Deschutes County Board of Elections Bend, OR 97701  541-388-6546

 

Douglas County Board of Elections   Roseburg, OR 97470  541-440-4252

 

Gilliam County Board of Elections   Condon, OR 97823    541-384-2311

 

Grant County Board of Elections Canyon City, OR 97820   541-575-1675

 

Harney County Board of Elections    Burns, OR 97720 541-573-6641

 

Hood River County Board of Elections    Hood River, OR 97031    541-386-1442

 

Jackson County Board of Elections   Medford, OR 97501   541-774-6148

 

Jefferson County Board of Elections Madras, OR 97741    541-475-4451

 

Josephine County Board of Elections Grants Pass, OR 97528   541-474-5243

 

Klamath County Board of Elections   Klamath Falls, OR 97601 541-883-5157

 

Lake County Board of Elections  Lakeview, OR 97630  541-947-6006

 

Lane County Board of Elections  Eugene, OR 97401    541-682-4234

 

 

Pennsylvania

 

 

Adams County Board of Elections Gettysburg, PA 17325    717-337-9832

 

Allegheny County Board of Elections Pittsburgh, PA 15219    412-350-4500

 

Armstrong County Board of Elections Kittanning, PA 16201    724-548-3222

 

Beaver County Board of Elections    Beaver, PA 15009    724-770-4440

 

Bedford County Board of Elections   Bedford, PA 15522   814-623-4807

 

Berks County Board of Elections Reading, PA 19601   610-478-6490

 

Blair County Board of Elections Hollidaysburg, PA 16648 814-693-3150

 

Bradford County Elections Bur   Towanda, PA 18848   570-265-1717

 

Bucks County Board of Elections Doylestown, PA 18901    215-348-6163

 

Butler County Board of Elections    Butler, PA 16001    724-284-5308

 

Cambria County Board of Elections   Ebensburg, PA 15931 814-472-1464

 

Cameron County Board of Elections   Emporium, PA 15834  814-486-2315

 

Carbon County Board of Elections    Jim Thorpe, PA 18229    570-325-4801

 

Centre County Board of Elections    Bellefonte, PA 16823    814-355-6703

 

Chester County Board of Elections   West Chester, PA 19382  610-344-6410

 

Clarion County Board of Elections   Clarion, PA 16214   814-226-4000

 

Clearfield County Board of Elections    Clearfield, PA 16830    814-765-2642

 

Clinton County Board of Elections   Lock Haven, PA 17745    570-893-4019

 

Columbia County Board of Elections  Bloomsburg, PA 17815    570-389-5640

 

Crawford County Board of Elections  Meadville, PA 16335 814-333-7308

 

Cumberland County Board of Elections    Carlisle, PA 17013  717-240-6385

 

Dauphin County Board of Elections   Harrisburg, PA 17108    717-780-6362

 

Delaware County Board of Elections  Media, PA 19063 610-891-4673

 

Elk County Board of Elections   Ridgway, PA 15853   814-776-5337

 

Erie County Board of Elections  Erie, PA 16501  814-451-6276

 

Fayette County Board of Elections   Uniontown, PA 15401 724-430-1289

 

Forest County Board of Elections    Tionesta, PA 16353  814-755-3537

 

Franklin County Board of Elections  Chambersburg, PA 17201  717-261-3886

 

Fulton County Board of Elections    McConnellsburg, PA 17233    717-485-3691

 

Greene County Board of Elections    Waynesburg, PA 15370    724-852-5304

 

Huntingdon County Board of Elections    Huntingdon, PA 16652    814-643-3091

 

Indiana County Board of Elections   Indiana, PA 15701   724-465-3852

 

Jefferson County Board of Elections Brookville, PA 15825    814-849-1653

 

Juniata County Board of Elections   Mifflintown, PA 17059   717-436-7706

 

Lackawanna County Board of Elections    Scranton, PA 18505  570-963-6737

 

Lancaster County Board of Elections Lancaster, PA 17603 717-295-3558

 

Lawrence County Board of Elections  New Castle, PA 16101    724-656-2161

 

Lebanon County Board of Elections   Lebanon, PA 17042   717-274-2801

 

Lehigh County Board of Elections    Allentown, PA 18101 610-782-3198

 

Luzerne County Board of Elections   Wilkes-Barre, PA 18701  570-825-1715

 

Lycoming County Board of Elections  Williamsport, PA 17701  570-327-2285

 

Mckean County Board of Elections    Smethport, PA 16749 814-887-5571

 

Mercer County Board of Elections    Mercer, PA 16137    724-662-7542

 

Mifflin County Board of Elections   Lewistown, PA 17044 717-248-6571

 

Monroe County Board of Elections    Stroudsburg, PA 18360   570-517-3165

 

Montgomery County Voter Services    Norristown, PA 19401    610-278-3280

 

Montour County Board of Elections   Danville, PA 17821  570-271-3000

 

Northampton County Board of Elections   Easton, PA 18042    610-559-3055

 

Northumberland County Board of Elections    Sunbury, PA 17801   570-988-4209

 

Perry County Board of Elections New Bloomfield, PA 17068    717-582-2131

 

Philadelphia County Board of Elections  Philadelphia, PA 19123  215-686-1505

 

Pike County Board of Elections  Milford, PA 18337   570-296-3426

 

Potter County Board of Elections    Coudersport, PA 16915   814-274-8467

 

Schuylkill County Board of Elections    Pottsville, PA 17901    570-628-1467

 

Snyder County Board of Elections    Middleburg, PA 17842    570-837-4207

 

Somerset County Board of Elections  Somerset, PA 15501  814-445-1549

 

Sullivan County Board of Elections  Laporte, PA 18626   570-946-5201

 

Susquehanna County Board of Elections   Montrose, PA 18801  570-278-4600

 

Tioga County Board of Elections Wellsboro, PA 16901 570-723-8230

 

Union County Board of Elections Lewisburg, PA 17837 570-524-8682

 

Venango County Board of Elections   Franklin, PA 16323  814-432-9514

 

Warren County Board of Elections    Warren, PA 16365    814-728-3406

 

Washington County Board of Elections    Washington, PA 15301    724-228-6750

 

Wayne County Board of Elections Honesdale, PA 18431 570-253-5970

 

Westmoreland County Board of Elections  Greensburg, PA 15601    724-830-3150

 

Wyoming County Board of Elections   Tunkhannock, PA 18657   570-996-2226

 

York County Board of Elections  York, PA 17401  717-771-9604

 

 

Virginia

 

 

Accomack County Board of Elections  Accomac, VA 23301   757-824-0525

 

Albemarle County Board of Elections Charlottesville, VA 22902   434-972-4173

 

Alexandria County Board of Elections    Alexandria, VA 22314    703-838-4050

 

Alleghany County Board of Elections Covington, VA 24426 540-965-1690

 

Amelia County Board of Elections    Amelia Court House, VA 23002    804-561-3460

 

Amherst County Board of Elections   Amherst, VA 24521   434-946-9315

 

Appomattox County Board of Elections    Appomattox, VA 24522    434-352-5302

 

Arlington County Board of Elections Arlington, VA 22201 703-228-3456

 

Augusta County Board of Elections   Verona, VA 24482    540-245-5656

 

Bath County Board of Elections  Warm Springs, VA 24484  540-839-7266

 

Bedford County Board of Elections   Bedford, VA 24523   540-586-7649

 

Bedford County Board of Elections   Bedford, VA 24523   540-587-6007

 

Bland County Board of Elections Bland, VA 24315 276-688-4441

 

Botetourt County Board of Elections Fincastle, VA 24090 540-473-8235

 

Bristol County Board of Elections   Bristol, VA 24201   276-645-7318

 

Brunswick County Board of Elections Lawrenceville, VA 23868 434-848-4414

 

Buchanan County Board of Elections  Grundy, VA 24614    276-935-6534

 

Buckingham County Board of Elections    Buckingham, VA 23921    434-969-4304

 

Buena Vista County Board of Elections   Buena Vista, VA 24416   540-261-8605

 

Campbell County Board of Elections  Rustburg, VA 24588  434-332-9579

 

Caroline County Board of Elections  Bowling Green, VA 22427 804-633-9083

 

Carroll County Board of Elections   Hillsville, VA 24343    276-730-3035

 

Charles City County Board of Elections  Charles City, VA 23030  804-652-4606

 

Charlotte County Board of Elections Charlotte Court House, VA 23923 434-542-5856

 

Charlottesville County Board of Elections   Charlottesville, VA 22902   434-970-3250

 

Chesapeake County Board of Elections    Chesapeake, VA 23322    757-277-9797

 

Chesterfield County Board of Elections  Chesterfield, VA 23832  804-748-1471

 

Clarke County Board of Elections    Berryville, VA 22611    540-955-5168

 

Colonial Heights County Board of Elections  Colonial Heights, VA 23834  804-520-9277

 

Covington County Board of Elections Covington, VA 24426 540-965-6380

 

Craig County Board of Elections New Castle, VA 24127    540-864-6190

 

Culpeper County Board of Elections  Culpeper, VA 22701  540-825-0652

 

Cumberland County Board of Elections    Cumberland, VA 23040    804-492-4504

 

Danville County Board of Elections  Danville, VA 24541  434-799-6560

 

Dickenson County Board of Elections Clintwood, VA 24228 276-926-1620

 

Dinwiddie County Board of Elections Dinwiddie, VA 23841 804-469-4500

 

Emporia County Board of Elections   Emporia, VA 23847   434-634-9533

 

Essex County Board of Elections Tappahannock, VA 22560  804-443-4611

 

Fairfax County Board of Elections   Fairfax, VA 22030   703-222-0776

 

Fairfax County Board of Elections   Fairfax, VA 22030   703-385-7890

 

Falls Church County Board of Elections  Falls Church, VA 22046  703-248-5085

 

Fauquier County Board of Elections  Warrenton, VA 20186 540-422-8290

 

Floyd County Board of Elections Floyd, VA 24091 540-745-9350

 

Fluvanna County Board of Elections  Palmyra, VA 22963   434-589-3593

 

Franklin County Board of Elections  Rocky Mount, VA 24151   540-483-3025

 

Franklin County Board of Elections  Franklin, VA 23851  757-562-8545

 

Frederick County Board of Elections Winchester, VA 22601    540-665-5660

 

Fredericksburg County Board of Elections    Fredericksburg, VA 22401    540-372-1030

 

Galax County Board of Elections Galax, VA 24333 276-236-7509

 

Giles County Board of Elections Pearisburg, VA 24134    540-921-2802

 

Gloucester County Board of Elections    Gloucester Courthouse, VA 23061 804-693-3659

 

Goochland County Board of Elections Goochland, VA 23063 804-556-5803

 

Grayson County Board of Elections   Independence, VA 24348  276-773-2842

 

Greene County Board of Elections    Stanardsville, VA 22973 434-985-5213

 

Greensville County Board of Elections   Emporia, VA 23847   434-348-4228

 

Halifax County Board of Elections   Halifax, VA 24558   434-476-3322

 

Hampton County Board of Elections   Hampton, VA 23666   757-727-6218

 

Hanover County Board of Elections   Hanover, VA 23069   804-365-6080

 

Harrisonburg County Board of Elections  Harrisonburg, VA 22801  540-432-7707

 

Henrico County Board of Elections   Richmond, VA 23228  804-501-4347

 

Henry County Board of Elections Collinsville, VA 24078  276-638-5108

 

Highland County Board of Elections  Monterey, VA 24465  540-468-2013

 

Hopewell County Board of Elections  Hopewell, VA 23860  804-541-2232

 

Isle Of Wight County Board of Elections Windsor, VA 23487   757-365-6230

 

James City County Board of Elections    Williamsburg, VA 23185  757-253-6868

 

King And Queen County Board of Elections    , VA 23085  804-785-5980

 

King George County Board of Elections   King George, VA 22485   540-775-9186

 

King William County Board of Elections  King William, VA 23086  804-769-4952

 

Lancaster County Board of Elections Lancaster, VA 22503 804-462-5277

 

Lee County Board of Elections   Jonesville, VA 24263    276-346-7780

 

Lexington County Board of Elections Lexington, VA 24450 540-462-3706

 

Loudoun County Board of Elections   Leesburg, VA 20175  703-777-0380

 

Louisa County Board of Elections    Louisa, VA 23093    540-967-3427

 

Lunenburg County Board of Elections Lunenburg, VA 23952 434-696-3071

 

Lynchburg County Board of Elections Lynchburg, VA 24501 434-847-1609

 

Madison County Board of Elections   Madison, VA 22727   540-948-6533

 

Manassas County Board of Elections  Manassas Park, VA 20111 703-335-8806

 

Manassas Park County Board of Elections Manassas, VA 20110  703-257-8230

 

Martinsville County Board of Elections  Martinsville, VA 24112  276-403-5122

 

Mathews County Board of Elections   Mathews, VA 23109   804-725-3200

 

Mecklenburg County Board of Elections   Boydton, VA 23917   434-738-6191

 

Middlesex County Board of Elections Saluda, VA 23149    804-758-4420

 

Montgomery County Board of Elections    Christiansburg, VA 24073    540-382-5741

 

Nelson County Board of Elections    Lovingston, VA 22949    434-263-4068

 

New Kent County Board of Elections  New Kent, VA 23124  804-966-9699

 

Newport News County Board of Elections  Newport News, VA 23607  757-926-8683

 

Norfolk County Board of Elections   Norfolk, VA 23510   757-664-4353

 

Northampton County Board of Elections   Cape Charles, VA 23310  757-678-0480

 

Northumberland County Board of Elections    Heathsville, VA 22473   804-580-4655

 

Norton County Board of Elections    Norton, VA 24273    276-679-1162

 

Orange County Board of Elections    Orange, VA 22960    540-672-5262

 

Page County Board of Elections  Luray, VA 22835 540-743-3986

 

Patrick County Board of Elections   Stuart, VA 24171    276-694-7206

 

Petersburg County Board of Elections    Petersburg, VA 23804    804-733-8071

 

Pittsylvania County Board of Elections  Chatham, VA 24531   434-432-7971

 

Poquoson County Board of Elections  Poquoson, VA 23662  757-868-3070

 

Portsmouth County Board of Elections    Portsmouth, VA 23704    757-393-8644

 

Powhatan County Board of Elections  Powhatan, VA 23139  804-598-5604

 

Prince Edward County Board of Elections Farmville, VA 23901 434-392-4767

 

Prince George County Board of Elections Prince George, VA 23875 804-722-8748

 

Prince William County Board of Elections    Manassas, VA 20110  703-792-6470

 

Pulaski County Board of Elections   Pulaski, VA 24301   540-980-2111

 

Radford County Board of Elections   Radford, VA 24141   540-267-3156

 

Rappahannock County Board of Elections  Washington, VA 22747    540-675-5380

 

Richmond County Board of Elections  Warsaw, VA 22572    804-333-4772

 

Richmond County Board of Elections  Richmond, VA 23261  804-646-5950

 

Roanoke County Board of Elections   Roanoke, VA 24011   540-853-2281

 

Roanoke County Board of Elections   Roanoke, VA 24018   540-772-7500

 

Rockbridge County Board of Elections    Lexington, VA 24450 540-463-7203

 

Rockingham County Board of Elections    Harrisonburg, VA 22802  540-564-3055

 

Russell County Board of Elections   Lebanon, VA 24266   276-889-8006

 

Salem County Board of Elections Salem, VA 24153 540-375-3034

 

Scott County Board of Elections Gate City, VA 24251 276-386-3843

 

Shenandoah County Board of Elections    Woodstock, VA 22664 540-459-6195

 

Smyth County Board of Elections Marion, VA 24354    276-783-7000

 

Southampton County Board of Elections   Courtland, VA 23837 757-653-9280

 

Spotsylvania County Board of Elections  Spotsylvania, VA 22553  540-507-7380

 

Stafford County Board of Elections  Stafford, VA 22554  540-658-4000

 

Staunton County Board of Elections  Staunton, VA 24401  540-332-3840

 

Suffolk County Board of Elections   Suffolk, VA 23434   757-514-7750

 

Surry County Board of Elections Surry, VA 23883 757-294-5213

 

Sussex County Board of Elections    Sussex, VA 23884    434-246-1047

 

Tazewell County Board of Elections  Tazewell, VA 24651  276-988-1305

 

Virginia Beach County Board of Elections    Virginia Beach, VA 23456    757-385-8683

 

Warren County Board of Elections    Front Royal, VA 22630   540-635-4327

 

Washington County Board of Elections    Abingdon, VA 24211  276-676-6227

 

Waynesboro County Board of Elections    Waynesboro, VA 22980    540-942-6620

 

Westmoreland County Board of Elections  Montross, VA 22520  804-493-8898

 

Williamsburg County Board of Elections  Williamsburg, VA 23185  757-220-6157

 

Winchester County Board of Elections    Winchester, VA 22601    540-545-7910

 

Wise County Board of Elections  Wise, VA 24293  276-328-8331

 

Wythe County Board of Elections Wytheville, VA 24382    276-223-6038

 

York County Board of Elections  Yorktown, VA 23690  757-890-3440

 

 

Washington

 

 

Adams County Board of Elections Ritzville, WA 99169 509-659-3249

 

Asotin County Board of Elections    Asotin, WA 99402    509-243-2084

 

Benton County Board of Elections    Prosser, WA 99350   509-736-3085

 

Chelan County Board of Elections    Wenatchee, WA 98807 509-667-6808

 

Clallam County Board of Elections   Port Angeles, WA 98362  360-417-2221

 

Clark County Board of Elections Vancouver, WA 98666 360-397-2345

 

Columbia County Board of Elections  Dayton, WA 99328    509-382-4541

 

Cowlitz County Board of Elections   Kelso, WA 98626 360-577-3005

 

Douglas County Board of Elections   Waterville, WA 98858    509-745-8527

 

Ferry County Board of Elections Republic, WA 99166  509-775-5200

 

Franklin County Board of Elections  Pasco, WA 99301 509-545-3538

 

Garfield County Board of Elections  Pomeroy, WA 99347   509-843-1411

 

Grant County Board of Elections Ephrata, WA 98823   509-754-2011

 

Grays Harbor County Board of Elections  Montesano, WA 98563 360-964-1556

 

Island County Board of Elections    Coupeville, WA 98239    360-679-7366

 

Jefferson County Board of Elections Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-385-9117

 

King County Board of Elections  Renton, WA 98057    206-296-8683

 

Kitsap County Board of Elections    Port Orchard, WA 98366  360-337-7128

 

Kittitas County Board of Elections  Ellensburg, WA 98926    509-962-7503

 

Klickitat County Board of Elections Goldendale, WA 98620    509-773-4001

 

Lewis County Board of Elections Chehalis, WA 98532  360-740-1278

 

Lincoln County Board of Elections   Davenport, WA 99122 509-725-4971

 

Mason County Board of Elections Shelton, WA 98584   360-427-9670

 

Okanogan County Board of Elections  Okanogan, WA 98840  509-422-7240

 

Pacific County Board of Elections   South Bend, WA 98586    360-875-9317

 

Pend Oreille County Board of Elections  Newport, WA 99156   509-447-3185

 

Pierce County Board of Elections    Tacoma, WA 98409    253-798-7430

 

San Juan County Board of Elections  Friday Harbor, WA 98250 360-378-3357

 

Skagit County Board of Elections    Mount Vernon, WA 98273  360-336-9305

 

Skamania County Board of Elections  Stevenson, WA 98648 509-427-3730

 

Snohomish County Board of Elections Everett, WA 98201   425-388-3444

 

Spokane County Board of Elections   Spokane, WA 99201   509-477-2320

 

Stevens County Board of Elections   Colville, WA 99114  509-684-7514

 

Thurston County Board of Elections  Olympia, WA 98502   360-786-5408

 

Wahkiakum County Board of Elections Cathlamet, WA 98612 360-795-3219

 

Walla Walla County Board of Elections   Walla Walla, WA 99362   509-524-2530

 

Whatcom County Board of Elections   Bellingham, WA 98225    360-676-6742

 

Whitman County Board of Elections   Colfax, WA 99111    509-397-5284

 

Yakima County Board of Elections    Yakima, WA 98901    509-574-1340

 

 

Wisconsin

 

 

Adams County Board of Elections Friendship, WI 53934    608-339-4200

 

Ashland County Board of Elections   Ashland, WI 54806   715-682-7016

 

Barron County Board of Elections    Barron, WI 54812    715-537-6200

 

Bayfield County Board of Elections  Washburn, WI 54891  715-373-6100

 

Brown County Board of Elections Green Bay, WI 54301 920-448-4016

 

Buffalo County Board of Elections   Alma, WI 54610  608-685-6209

 

Burnett County Board of Elections   Siren, WI 54872 715-349-2173

 

Calumet County Board of Elections   Chilton, WI 53014   920-849-2361

 

Clark County Board of Elections Neillsville, WI 54456   715-743-5148

 

Columbia County Board of Elections  Portage, WI 53901   608-742-9654

 

Crawford County Board of Elections  Prairie du Chien, WI 53821  608-326-0200

 

Dane County Board of Elections  Madison, WI 53703   608-266-4121

 

Dodge County Board of Elections Juneau, WI 53039    920-386-3600

 

Door County Board of Elections  Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235  920-746-2200

 

Douglas County Board of Elections   Superior, WI 54880  715-395-1341

 

Dunn County Board of Elections  Menomonie, WI 54751 715-232-1677

 

Eau Claire County Board of Elections    Eau Claire, WI 54703    715-839-4803

 

Florence County Board of Elections  Florence, WI 54121  715-528-3201

 

Forest County Board of Elections    Crandon, WI 54520   715-478-2422

 

Grant County Board of Elections Lancaster, WI 53813 608-723-2675

 

Green County Board of Elections Monroe, WI 53566    608-328-9430

 

Green Lake County Board of Elections    Green Lake, WI 54941    920-294-4005

 

Iowa County Board of Elections  Dodgeville, WI 53533    608-935-0399

 

Iron County Board of Elections  Hurley, WI 54534    715-561-3375

 

Jackson County Board of Elections   Black River Falls, WI 54615 715-284-0201

 

Jefferson County Board of Elections Jefferson, WI 53549 920-674-8630

 

Juneau County Board of Elections    Mauston, WI 53948   608-847-9300

 

Kenosha County Board of Elections   Kenosha, WI 53140   262-653-2552

 

Kewaunee County Board of Elections  Kewaunee, WI 54216  920-388-7133

 

La Crosse County Board of Elections La Crosse, WI 54601 608-785-9581

 

Lafayette County Board of Elections Darlington, WI 53530    608-776-4850

 

Langlade County Board of Elections  Antigo, WI 54409    715-627-6200

 

Lincoln County Board of Elections   Merrill, WI 54452   715-539-1020

 

Marathon County Board of Elections  Wausau, WI 54403    715-261-1500

 

Marinette County Board of Elections Marinette, WI 54143 715-732-7406

 

Marquette County Board of Elections Montello, WI 53949  608-297-3016

 

Menominee County Board of Elections Keshena, WI 54135   715-799-3311

 

Milwaukee County Board of Elections Milwaukee, WI 53233 414-278-4060

 

Monroe County Board of Elections    Sparta, WI 54656    608-269-8705

 

Oconto County Board of Elections    Oconto, WI 54153    920-834-6800

 

Oneida County Board of Elections    Rhinelander, WI 54501   715-369-6144

 

Outagamie County Board of Elections Appleton, WI 54911  920-832-5077

 

Ozaukee County Board of Elections   Port Washington, WI 53074   262-284-8110

 

Pepin County Board of Elections Durand, WI 54736    715-672-8857

 

Pierce County Board of Elections    Ellsworth, WI 54011 715-273-6744

 

Polk County Board of Elections  Balsam Lake, WI 54810   715-485-9226

 

Portage County Board of Elections   Stevens Point, WI 54481 715-346-1351

 

Racine County Board of Elections    Racine, WI 53403    262-637-2394

 

Richland County Board of Elections  Richland Center, WI 53581   608-649-5922

 

Rock County Board of Elections  Janesville, WI 53545    608-757-5660

 

Rusk County Board of Elections  Ladysmith, WI 54848 715-532-2100

 

Sauk County Board of Elections  Baraboo, WI 53913   608-355-3286

 

Sawyer County Board of Elections    Hayward, WI 54843   715-634-4866

 

Shawano County Board of Elections   Shawano, WI 54166   715-526-9150

 

St Croix County Board of Elections  Hudson, WI 54016    715-386-4607

 

Taylor County Board of Elections    Medford, WI 54451   715-748-1460

 

Trempealeau County Board of Elections   Whitehall, WI 54773 715-538-2311

 

Vernon County Board of Elections    Viroqua, WI 54665   608-637-5380

 

Vilas County Board of Elections Eagle River, WI 54521   715-479-3600

 

Walworth County Board of Elections  Elkhorn, WI 53121   262-741-4241

 

Washburn County Board of Elections  Shell Lake, WI 54871    715-468-4600

 

Washington County Board of Elections    West Bend, WI 53095 262-335-4400

 

Waukesha County Board of Elections  Waukesha, WI 53188  262-548-7010

 

Waupaca County Board of Elections   Waupaca, WI 54981   715-258-6200

 

Waushara County Board of Elections  Wautoma, WI 54982   920-787-0442

Winnebago County Board of Elections Oshkosh, WI 54901   920-236-4888

#StopSoros and his Smartmatic Voting Machines from Rigging the Election! ====== – Pastebin.com.

UK directing hideous Yemen civilian bombing campaign. Is Parliament not interested?

U.S. and U.K. Continue to Participate in War Crimes, Targeting of Yemeni Civilians

By Glenn Greenwald

From the start of the hideous Saudi bombing campaign against Yemen 18 months ago, two countries have played active, vital roles in enabling the carnage: the U.S. and U.K. The atrocities committed by the Saudis would have been impossible without their steadfast, aggressive support.

yemen_0421

The Obama administration “has offered to sell $115 billion worth of weapons to Saudi Arabia over its eight years in office, more than any previous U.S. administration,” as The Guardian reported this week, and also provides extensive surveillance technology. As The Intercept documented in April, “In his first five years as president, Obama sold $30 billion more in weapons than President Bush did during his entire eight years as commander in chief.”

Most important, according to the Saudi foreign minister, although it is the Saudis who have ultimate authority to choose targets, “British and American military officials are in the command and control center for Saudi airstrikes on Yemen” and “have access to lists of targets.” In sum, while this bombing campaign is invariably described in Western media outlets as “Saudi-led,” the U.S. and U.K. are both central, indispensable participants. As the New York Times editorial page put it in August: “The United States is complicit in this carnage,” while The Guardian editorialized that“Britain bears much responsibility for this suffering.”

From the start, the U.S.- and U.K.-backed Saudis have indiscriminately and at times deliberately bombed civilians, killing thousands of innocent people. From Yemen, Iona Craig and Alex Potter have reported extensively for The Intercept on the widespread civilian deaths caused by this bombing campaign. As the Saudis continued to recklessly and intentionally bomb civilians, the American and British weapons kept pouring into Riyadh, ensuring that the civilian massacres continued. Every once and awhile, when a particularly gruesome mass killing made its way into the news, Obama and various British officials would issue cursory, obligatory statements expressing “concern,” then go right back to fueling the attacks.

This weekend, as American attention was devoted almost exclusively to Donald Trump, one of the most revolting massacres took place. On Saturday,warplanes attacked a funeral gathering in Sana, repeatedly bombing the hall where it took place, killing over 100 people and wounding more than 500 (see photo above). Video shows just some of the destruction and carnage:

Video shows double tap Saudi airstrike on funeral hall in Sanaa, #Yemen, today. Hundreds killed or wounded. Saudis deny, no word from US.pic.twitter.com/6TYlQWPrCN

— Samuel Oakford (@samueloakford) October 8, 2016

Saudi officials first lied by trying to blame “other causes” but have since walked that back. The next time someone who identifies with the Muslim world attacks American or British citizens, and those countries’ leading political voices answer the question “why, oh why, do they hate us?” by assuring everyone that “they hate us for our freedoms,” it would be instructive to watch that video.

The Obama White House, through its spokesperson Ned Price, condemned what it called “the troubling series of attacks striking Yemeni civilians” — attacks, it did not note, it has repeatedly supported — and lamely warned that “U.S. security cooperation with Saudi Arabia is not a blank check.” That is exactly what it is. The 18 months of bombing supported by the U.S. and U.K. has, as the NYT put it this morning, “largely failed, while reports of civilian deaths have grown common, and much of the country is on the brink of famine.”

It has been known from the start that the Saudi bombing campaign has been indiscriminate and reckless, and yet Obama and the U.K. government continued to play central roles. A U.N. report obtained in January by The Guardian “uncovered ‘widespread and systematic’ attacks on civilian targets in violation of international humanitarian law”; the report found that “the coalition had conducted airstrikes targeting civilians and civilian objects, in violation of international humanitarian law, including camps for internally displaced persons and refugees; civilian gatherings, including weddings; civilian vehicles, including buses; civilian residential areas; medical facilities; schools; mosques; markets, factories and food storage warehouses; and other essential civilian infrastructure.”

But what was not known, until an excellent Reuters report by Warren Strobel and Jonathan Landay this morning, is that Obama was explicitly warned not only that the Saudis were committing war crimes, but that the U.S. itself could be legally regarded as complicit in them:

The Obama administration went ahead with a $1.3 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia last year despite warnings from some officials that the United States could be implicated in war crimes for supporting a Saudi-led air campaign in Yemen that has killed thousands of civilians, according to government documents and the accounts of current and former officials.

State Department officials also were privately skeptical of the Saudi military’s ability to target Houthi militants without killing civilians and destroying “critical infrastructure” needed for Yemen to recover, according to the emails and other records obtained by Reuters and interviews with nearly a dozen officials with knowledge of those discussions.

In other words, the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner was explicitly advised that he might be a collaborator in war crimes by arming a campaign that deliberately targets civilians, and continued to provide record-breaking amounts of arms to aid their prosecution. None of that should be surprising: It would be difficult for Obama to condemn “double-tap” strikes of the kind the Saudis just perpetrated — where first responders or mourners are targeted — given that he himself has used that tactic, commonly described as a hallmark of “terrorism.” For their part, the British blocked EU inquiries into whether war crimes were being committed in Yemen, while key MPs have blocked reports proving that U.K. weapons were being used in the commission of war crimes and the deliberate targeting of civilians.

The U.S. and U.K. are the two leading countries when it comes to cynically exploiting human rights concerns and the laws of war to attack their adversaries. They and their leading columnists love to issue pretty, self-righteous speeches about how other nations — those primitive, evil ones over there — target civilians and commit war crimes. Yet here they both are, standing firmly behind one of the planet’s most brutal and repressive regimes, arming it to the teeth with the full and undeniable knowledge that they are enabling massacres that recklessly, and in many cases, deliberately, target civilians.

And these 18 months of atrocities have barely merited a mention in the U.S. election, despite the key role the leading candidate, Hillary Clinton, has played in arming the Saudis, to say nothing of the millions of dollars her family’s foundation has received from its regime (her opponent, Donald Trump, has barely uttered a word about the issue, and himself has received millions in profits from various Saudi oligarchs).

One reason American and British political and media elites love to wax eloquently when condemning the brutality of the enemies of their own government is because doing so advances tribal, nationalistic ends: It’s a strategy for weakening adversaries while strengthening their own governments. But at least as significant a motive is that issuing such condemnations distracts attention from their own war crimes and massacres, the ones they are enabling and supporting.

There are some nations on the planet with credibility to condemn war crimes and the deliberate targeting of civilians. The two countries who have spent close to two years arming Saudi Arabia in its ongoing slaughter of Yemeni civilians are most certainly not among them.

October 11, 2016 “Information Clearing House” – “The Intercept” –

 

UK directing hideous Yemen civilian bombing campaign. Is Parliament not interested?

« Older Entries Recent Entries »